Phase 3
N=734
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Adults With Axial Spondyloarthritis
Spondyloarthritis
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04169373 ↗Enrolled (actual)
734
Serious AEs
5.7%
Results posted
Sep 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response at Week 14 — 18.2; 44.5 percentage of participants — p=<0.0001
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Interventions
- Upadacitinib (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- AbbVie
- Primary completion
- Sep 2021
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Study 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40 (ASAS40) Response at Week 14 |
18.2; 44.5 | <0.0001 sig |
| PRIMARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 14 |
22.5; 44.9 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 14 |
-0.49; -1.52 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Change From Baseline in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score for the Spine at Week 14 |
-0.04; -3.95 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Percentage of Participants With Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Response at Week 14 |
16.7; 43.1 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Percentage of Participants With an ASAS20 Response at Week 14 |
38.3; 65.4 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 14 |
1.9; 12.8 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Total Back Pain at Week 14 |
-1.47; -3.00 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Nocturnal Back Pain at Week 14 |
-1.52; -3.21 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease Activity at Week 14 |
10.1; 44.1 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 14 |
-1.09; -2.26 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Week 14 |
4.3; 17.5 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score at Week 14 |
-2.03; -5.10 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index at Week 14 |
-1.07; -2.93 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Change From Baseline in Linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI[Lin]) at Week 14 |
-0.16; -0.48 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) at Week 14 |
-1.1; -2.6 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 1: Change From Baseline in MRI SPARCC Score for Sacroiliac Joints at Week 14 |
1.05; -2.26 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Change From Baseline in ASDAS at Week 14 |
-0.71; -1.36 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Change From Baseline in MRI SPARCC Score for SI Joints at Week 14 |
0.57; -2.49 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Response at Week 14 |
22.1; 42.3 | 0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 14 |
5.2; 14.1 | 0.0063 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Total Back Pain at Week 14 |
-2.00; -2.91 | 0.0004 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Nocturnal Back Pain at Week 14 |
-1.84; -2.96 | 0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease Activity at Week 14 |
18.3; 42.3 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Week 14 |
7.6; 18.6 | 0.0035 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Change From Baseline in BASFI at Week 14 |
-1.47; -2.61 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Change From Baseline in ASQoL at Week 14 |
-3.15; -5.38 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index at Week 14 |
-1.48; -3.26 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS20 Response at Week 14 |
43.8; 66.7 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Change From Baseline in BASMI(Lin) at Week 14 |
-0.19; -0.29 | 0.1781 |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Change From Baseline in MASES at Week 14 |
-1.6; -2.3 | 0.0193 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response at Week 52 |
42.7; 62.8 | 0.0003 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Change From Baseline in MRI SPARCC Score for the Spine at Week 14 |
0.34; -0.79 | 0.0206 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants Who Initiated Rescue Treatment Between Week 24 and Week 52 |
13.4; 5.1; 1.9; 3.2; 0.6; 0.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Major Improvement at Week 52 |
20.4; 37.8 | 0.0004 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 52 |
10.8; 32.7 | <0.0001 sig |
| SECONDARY Study 2: Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease Activity at Week 52 |
32.5; 55.8 | <0.0001 sig |
Summary
This protocol includes 2 standalone studies with randomization, data collection, analysis and reporting conducted independently.
The main objectives of this protocol are:
* To evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib compared with placebo on reduction of signs and symptoms in adults with active axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) including biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug inadequate responders (bDMARD-IR) ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (Study 1) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) (Study 2).
* To assess the safety and tolerability of upadacitinib in adults with active axSpA including bDMARD-IR AS (Study 1) and nr-axSpA (Study 2).
* To evaluate the safety and tolerability of upadacitinib in extended treatment in adult participants with active axSpA including bDMARD-IR AS who have completed the Double-Blind Period (Study 1) and nr-axSpA who have completed the Double-Blind Period (Study 2).
* To evaluate the maintenance of disease control after withdrawal of upadacitinib.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Study 1:
- Must have a clinical diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and meet the modified New York Criteria for AS,
- Must not have total spinal ankylosis
- Must have been previously exposed to 1 or 2 bDMARDs (at least 1 tumor necrosis factor [TNF] inhibitor or 1 interleukin [IL]-17 inhibitor [IL-17i]), and must have discontinued the bDMARD therapy due to either lack of efficacy (after at least 12 weeks of treatment with a bDMARD at an adequate dose) or intolerance (irrespective of treatment duration). Prior exposure to two bDMARDs was allowed for no more than 30% of patients; among patients with prior exposure to two bDMARDs, a lack of efficacy to one bDMARD and intolerance to another was permitted, but a patient could not have a lack of efficacy to two bDMARDs
- Study 2:
- Must have a clinical diagnosis of nr-axSpA fulfilling the 2009 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA but not meeting the radiologic criterion of the modified New York criteria for AS
- Must have objective signs of active inflammation consistent with axSpA on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac (SI) joints or based on high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) > the upper limit of normal (ULN).
- Prior treatment with at most one bDMARD (either TNF inhibitor or IL-17i) is allowed for at least 20% but no more than 35% of enrolled patients who had to discontinue the prior bDMARD due to either lack of efficacy (after ≥ 12 weeks at an adequate dose) or intolerance (regardless of treatment duration).
- Must have a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥ 4 at the Screening and Baseline Visits.
- Must have a Total Back Pain score ≥ 4 based on a 0 - 10 numerical rating scale at the Screening and Baseline Visits.
- Has had an inadequate response to at least 2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) over an at least 4-week period in total at maximum recommended or tolerated doses, or has an intolerance to or contraindication for NSAIDs as defined by the Investigator.
Exclusion Criteria
- Must not have been exposed to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor (including but not limited to upadacitinib [Rinvoq®], tofacitinib [Xeljanz®], baricitinib [Olumiant®], filgotinib, ruxolitinib [Jakafi®], abrocitinib [PF-04965842], and peficitinib [Smyraf®]).
- Prior bDMARD therapy must be washed out.
- Participant must not have a history of an allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to constituents of the study drug.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04169373). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.