N/A
Completed N=38
Comparison of the Viveve Treatment and Cryogen-Only Treatment Versus Sham Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04206085 ↗Enrolled (actual)
38
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2022
Primary outcomePrimary: 1-hour Pad Weight Test — -9.0; -6.3; -4.4 Grams
Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, study comparing both the Viveve Treatment (RF plus cryogen) and cryogen alone treatment versus sham treatment in patients with mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY 1-hour Pad Weight Test |
-9.0; -6.3; -4.4 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Pre-menopausal females, ≥ 18 years of age. Premenopausal is defined as a woman who has had menstrual cycles over the previous 12 months.
- Subjects with a BMI of ≤ 35 kg/m².
- 1-hr pad weight at Baseline with a 5 to 50 g net increase from the pre-test pad weight
Exclusion Criteria
- Subjects who are currently breastfeeding or have discontinued breastfeeding fewer than 6 months prior to screening.
- Subjects who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the course of the study.
- Subjects who have undergone other stress urinary incontinence treatments, excluding behavioral modifications (e.g., Kegel exercises).
- Has any implantable electrical device [e.g., implantable pacemaker, automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD)].
- Subjects who have started or changed dose of local vaginal hormones <6 weeks before Screening.
- Subjects who have started pelvic floor physical therapy within the last 3 months.
- Undergone previous elective surgical or non-invasive procedure(s) in the vaginal canal (including the Viveve Treatment or any other genital radiofrequency treatment; injectable bulking agent, cosmetic, laser, surgical, and/or genital enhancement procedure, and previous dilation and cuterage within 12 months of the subject's Pre-Screening Visit).
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04206085). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.