Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=72 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Safety of Gebauer's Pain Ease and Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride

Spray · Pain · Safety Issues

Enrolled (actual)
72
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Presence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU) — 2; 1; 1; 1 Number of samples with 1+ CFU — p=0.317

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Gebauer's Pain Ease Top Aerosol Mist Spray (Drug); Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Henry Ford Health System
Primary completion
Feb 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Presence of Microbial Growth (1+ CFU)
2; 1; 1; 1; 1; 0 0.317

Summary

This study aims to determine if Gebauer's Pain Ease or Gebauer's Ethyl Chloride topical anesthetic sprays are safe for use as numbing agents prior to placing epidurals and arterial lines, based on whether they introduce increased microbial growth after application to skin. Due to the recent national shortage of lidocaine, we hope to find a suitable alternative to lidocaine for topical analgesia when placing arterial lines and epidurals. Our hypothesis is that the sprays will not affect the sterility of the area. We will compare microbial growth from three subsequent swabs taken from a single area of skin on the wrist and lower back: one with no treatment, the second after treatment with ChloraPrep, and the third after applying one of the numbing sprays. If there is significantly higher growth in the swabs containing the topical anesthetic spray versus the ChloraPrep alone, this will indicate that the sprays introduce microbes to the sites of skin.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Henry Ford employees

Exclusion Criteria

  • People with infections at the site of prep
  • People with history of hypersensitivity to numbing sprays or chloraprep
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04207710). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search