N/A
N=42,188
Temporal Trends of Thrombolysis Treatment in Chinese Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) Patients From 2007-2017: Analysis of China National Stroke Registry (CNSR) I, II, and III; CTP-Draft Review Performed;
Stroke
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04290494 ↗Enrolled (actual)
42,188
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Nov 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Patients Who Received Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment Within 3 Hours of Symptom Onset Among 2 Hours Intravenous Thrombolytics (IVT) Eligible Patients — 11.66; 10.66; 28.77 Percentage of participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Observational
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- IV rtPA (intravenous recombinant plasminogen activator) (Drug)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Primary completion
- Sep 2020
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percentage of Patients Who Received Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment Within 3 Hours of Symptom Onset Among 2 Hours Intravenous Thrombolytics (IVT) Eligible Patients |
11.66; 10.66; 28.77 | — |
| PRIMARY Percentage of Patients Who Received Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment Within 4.5 Hours of Symptom Onset Among 3.5 Hours Intravenous Thrombolytics (IVT) Eligible Patients |
13.53; 7.11; 33.44 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Patients Who Arrived at Hospital Within 2 Hours of Symptom Onset and Who Received Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment Within 3 Hours of Symptom Onset Among All Eligible Patients |
0.92; 1.32; 3.61 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Patients Who Arrived at Hospital Within 3.5 Hours of Symptom Onset and Who Received Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment Within 4.5 Hours of Symptom Onset Among All Eligible Patients |
1.57; 1.47; 6.96 | — |
| SECONDARY The Door to Needle (DTN) Time (Time Between Arrival at Hospital and the Administration of Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment) Among 3 Hours IV-rtPA Treated Patients |
90.0; 100.0; 58.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Patients With Door to Needle (DTN) Time (Time Between Arrival at Hospital and the Administration of Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment) ≤ 60 Minutes Among 3 Hours IV-rtPA Treated Patients |
28.71; 12.29; 59.21 | — |
| SECONDARY Time Between Symptom Onset and Arrival at Hospital Among 3 Hours Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treated Patients |
60.0; 59.0; 69.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Time Between Symptom Onset and the Administration of Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment Among 3 Hours IV-rtPA Treated Patients |
150.0; 156.0; 134.0 | — |
| SECONDARY The Door to Needle (DTN) Time (Time Between Arrival at Hospital and the Administration of Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment) Among 4.5 Hours IV-rtPA Treated Patients |
94.0; 95.0; 60.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Patients With Door to Needle (DTN) Time (Time Between Arrival at Hospital and the Administration of Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment) ≤ 60 Minutes Among 4.5 Hours IV-rtPA Treated Patients |
26.74; 13.36; 53.43 | — |
| SECONDARY Time Between Symptom Onset and Arrival at Hospital Among 4.5 Hours Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treated Patients |
75.0; 59.0; 100.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Time Between Symptom Onset and the Administration of Intravenous Recombinant Plasminogen Activator (IV-rtPA) Treatment Among 4.5 Hours IV-rtPA Treated Patients |
175.0; 159.0; 170.0 | — |
Summary
The present study is to be conducted based on the AIS patient data collected from CNSR I, II, and III.
The primary objectives are:
* To investigate the temporal changes in the proportion of intravenous recombinant plasminogen activator (IV rtPA) treatment from 2007 to 2017 among Intravenous Thrombolytics (IVT) eligible patients (patient groups B and B') and overall AIS patients (patient group A) in China;
* To investigate the temporal changes in IV rtPA treatment time intervals from 2007 to 2017 among IV rtPA treated patients (patient groups C and C') in China.
The secondary objectives are:
- To describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of the IV rtPA treated patients (patient groups C and C'), IVT eligible patients (patient groups B and B') and the overall AIS patients (patient group A) from 2007 to 2017 from the CNSR I to III.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patient group A: All AIS patients
- Aged 18 80 years
- Diagnosed with AIS on admission
- Patient groups B and B': IVT eligible patients
- Met the in- and exclusion criteria of "all AIS patients"
- Arrived at hospital within 2 h (patient group B) or 3.5 h (patient group B') of symptom onset
- Patient groups C and C': IV rtPA treated patients
- Met the in- and exclusion criteria of "IVT eligible patients"
- Treated with IV rtPA within 3 h (patient group C) or 4.5 h (patient group C') of symptom onset
Exclusion Criteria
- Patient group A: All AIS patients
- Missing baseline data including age and gender
- Diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), or unspecific stroke
- Arrived at hospital after 7 days of symptom onset
- Patient groups B and B': IVT eligible patients
- Missing key data including:
i. symptom onset time (or last known well time) ii. hospital arrival time iii. whether received IVT treatment or not iv. the time of IVT treatment
- Documented IVT absolute contraindications, according to the case report form (CRF) for each wave of CNSR
- Patient groups C and C': IV rtPA treated patients
- Not received IVT
- Received IVT other than rtPA
- Treated with IV rtPA after 3 h (patient group C) or 4.5 h (patient group C') of symptom onset
- Received additional treatments with intra arterial reperfusion or experimental therapies
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04290494). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.