Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=12 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Fractional CO2 Vaginal LASER Therapy for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04301934 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
12
Serious AEs
16.7%
Results posted
Mar 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) — 28.6; 60; 71.4; 40 percentage of subjects — p=0.034

Summary

Randomized controlled trial to determine clinical and microbiome difference between fractional CO2 Laser and vaginal estrogen in treating patients with recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI).

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections (UTI)
28.6; 60; 71.4; 40 0.034 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Female patient >18 years old
  • Postmenopausal status, documented by prior bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, or absence of menses >12 months
  • Recurrent urinary tract infections as defined by 3 culture positive urine cultures in the last 12 months, or 2 positive urine cultures in the last 6 months.(Positive urine cultures defined by >100K colony forming units of 1 or 2 bacterial species on clean catch sample, or >1000 colony forming units of 1 or 2 bacterial species on sample via straight catheterization).
  • Patients on vaginal estrogen must undergo a 1 month washout period prior to initiation of the trial.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Hematuria without appropriate workup
  • Pelvic organ prolapse at or beyond the hymen
  • Clinically relevant urinary retention
  • Pelvic reconstructive surgery within 6 months
  • Prior synthetic mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence
  • Clinically relevant nephrolithiasis
  • History of breast cancer
  • Contraindication to topical estrogen therapy
  • Anticoagulation therapy
  • Prior pelvic or vaginal radiation therapy
  • Prior gynecologic malignancy
  • Undiagnosed genital bleeding
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04301934). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search