Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=151 Diagnostic

Study to Establish the Diagnostic Performance of 18F Fluciclovine PET in Detecting Recurrent Brain Metastases

Brain Metastases

Enrolled (actual)
151
Serious AEs
1.3%
Results posted
Aug 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) and Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) Subject Level — 23.8; 34.1; 36.6; 82.6 percentage

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
18F fluciclovine (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Blue Earth Diagnostics
Primary completion
Jun 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) and Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) Subject Level
23.8; 34.1; 36.6; 82.6; 70.9; 70.9
SECONDARY
Subject Level Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
34.5; 30.4; 31.9; 73.8; 74.3; 75.0
SECONDARY
Lesion-level Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) and Negative Percent Agreement (NPA)
18.4; 28.6; 30.6; 84.1; 74.6; 73.2
SECONDARY
Lesion-level Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
29.0; 28.6; 28.8; 74.4; 74.6; 74.8
SECONDARY
Subject-level Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) & Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) Diagnostic Performance of Fluciclovine (18F) PET in Detecting Recurrent Brain Metastases in Different Clinical Settings - Tumor Type
50.0; 50.0; 0.0; 83.3; 72.2; 66.7
SECONDARY
Subject-level Positive Predictive Value (PPV) & Negative Predictive Value (NPV) Diagnostic Performance of Fluciclovine (18F) PET in Detecting Recurrent Brain Metastases in Different Clinical Settings - Tumor Type
25.0; 16.7; 0.0; 93.8; 92.9; 85.7
SECONDARY
Subject-level Positive Percent Agreement (NPA) & Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) Diagnostic Performance of Fluciclovine (18F) PET in Detecting Recurrent Brain Metastases in Different Clinical Settings - Concurrent Immunotherapy
0.0; 16.7; 16.7; 100.0; 86.7; 90.0
SECONDARY
Subject-level Positive Predictive Value (PPV) & Negative Predictive Value (NPV) Diagnostic Performance of Fluciclovine (18F) PET in Detecting Recurrent Brain Metastases in Different Clinical Settings - Concurrent Immunotherapy
20.0; 25.0; 83.3; 83.9; 84.4; 34.5
SECONDARY
Clinical Usefulness
26.5
SECONDARY
Clinical Usefulness
26.5
SECONDARY
Clinical Usefulness
26.5
SECONDARY
Inter-reader Reproducibility
86.1; 84.1; 91.4
SECONDARY
Intra-reader Reproducibility
93.5; 93.5; 100.0
SECONDARY
Assess the Safety of Fluciclovine (18F) Injection in the Subject Population, Blood Pressure
128.7; 132.4; 3.5; 75.4; 77.0; 1.5
SECONDARY
Assess the Safety of Fluciclovine (18F) Injection in the Subject Population, Heart Rate
76.2; 74.5; -1.7
SECONDARY
Assess the Safety of Fluciclovine (18F) Injection in the Subject Population, Respiratory Rate
16.7; 16.5; -0.2
SECONDARY
Assess the Safety of Fluciclovine (18F) Injection in the Subject Population, Body Temperature
36.53; 36.53; -0.00

Summary

An open-label, single dose, single arm, prospective, multicenter Phase 3 study to establish the diagnostic performance of 18F fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting recurrent brain metastases after radiation therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, or 2 if this is an acute deterioration
  • Previous history of solid tumor brain metastasis of any origin
  • Histopathological confirmation of the primary solid tumor or a metastatic site within 4 years
  • Previous radiation therapy of brain metastatic lesion(s)
  • A reference lesion considered by the site investigator to be equivocal for recurrent brain metastasis
  • Patient requires further confirmatory diagnostic procedures to confirm brain MRI findings and is planned for biopsy/neurosurgical intervention as standard of care (SoC) or clinical follow-up as SoC

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a history of active hematological malignancy
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04410133). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search