N/A
Completed N=76
The Baerveldt Versus ClearPath Comparison Study
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04468633 ↗Enrolled (actual)
76
Serious AEs
1.3%
Results posted
Sep 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Intraocular Pressure (IOP) — 21.7; 22.4; 14.9; 12.6 mmHg — p=0.687
Summary
This is a randomized prospective study of post-operative surgical outcomes and complication rates in patients with a Baerveldt 350 implant vs the Ahmed ClearPath implant. Each subject will be randomized to the Baerveldt group or ClearPath group at the time of consent for the study.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Intraocular Pressure (IOP) |
21.7; 22.4; 14.9; 12.6; 10.7; 11.5 | 0.687 |
| PRIMARY Number of Participants Who Experienced a Complication |
13; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) |
0.40; 0.56; 0.71; 1.09; 0.65; 1.03 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Individual Eyedrop Medications That the Patient is on (Prescribed and Actually Taking) |
2.7; 2.7; 0.6; 0.7; 0.8; 0.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) |
2.81; 4.72 | 0.759 |
| SECONDARY Change in Thickness of the Cornea as Measured by Pachymetry |
12.18; 25.96 | 0.603 |
| SECONDARY Change in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) |
2.81; 4.72 | 0.833 |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Men or women with age at screening ≥ 18 years and ≤ 90 years
- Inadequately controlled glaucoma
- Valve-less aqueous shunt as the planned surgical procedure
- Patients with primary glaucomas or pseudoexfoliation, pigmentary and traumatic glaucoma with a previous failed trabeculectomy or other intraocular surgery included.
- Primary tubes included
- Investigators to recruit consecutively all eligible patients from their clinics.
- Superotemporal or inferonasal placement of the tube
- Capable and willing to provide consent
Exclusion Criteria
- NLP
- Unable/unwilling to provide informed consent
- Unavailable for regular follow up
- Previous cyclodestructive procedure
- Prior scleral buckling procedure or other external impediment to supratemporal drainage device implantation
- Presence of silicone oil
- Vitreous in the anterior chamber sufficient to require a vitrectomy
- Uveitic glaucoma
- Neovascular glaucoma
- Nanophthalmos
- Sturge-Weber syndrome or other conditions associated with elevated episcleral venous pressure
- Procedure combined with other surgery
- Any abnormality other than glaucoma in the study eye that could affect tonometry.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04468633). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.