Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=76 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

The Baerveldt Versus ClearPath Comparison Study

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04468633 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
76
Serious AEs
1.3%
Results posted
Sep 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Intraocular Pressure (IOP) — 21.7; 22.4; 14.9; 12.6 mmHg — p=0.687

Summary

This is a randomized prospective study of post-operative surgical outcomes and complication rates in patients with a Baerveldt 350 implant vs the Ahmed ClearPath implant. Each subject will be randomized to the Baerveldt group or ClearPath group at the time of consent for the study.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
21.7; 22.4; 14.9; 12.6; 10.7; 11.5 0.687
PRIMARY
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Complication
13; 4
SECONDARY
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
0.40; 0.56; 0.71; 1.09; 0.65; 1.03
SECONDARY
Number of Individual Eyedrop Medications That the Patient is on (Prescribed and Actually Taking)
2.7; 2.7; 0.6; 0.7; 0.8; 0.9
SECONDARY
Change in Humphrey Visual Field (HVF)
2.81; 4.72 0.759
SECONDARY
Change in Thickness of the Cornea as Measured by Pachymetry
12.18; 25.96 0.603
SECONDARY
Change in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL)
2.81; 4.72 0.833

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Men or women with age at screening ≥ 18 years and ≤ 90 years
  • Inadequately controlled glaucoma
  • Valve-less aqueous shunt as the planned surgical procedure
  • Patients with primary glaucomas or pseudoexfoliation, pigmentary and traumatic glaucoma with a previous failed trabeculectomy or other intraocular surgery included.
  • Primary tubes included
  • Investigators to recruit consecutively all eligible patients from their clinics.
  • Superotemporal or inferonasal placement of the tube
  • Capable and willing to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • NLP
  • Unable/unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Unavailable for regular follow up
  • Previous cyclodestructive procedure
  • Prior scleral buckling procedure or other external impediment to supratemporal drainage device implantation
  • Presence of silicone oil
  • Vitreous in the anterior chamber sufficient to require a vitrectomy
  • Uveitic glaucoma
  • Neovascular glaucoma
  • Nanophthalmos
  • Sturge-Weber syndrome or other conditions associated with elevated episcleral venous pressure
  • Procedure combined with other surgery
  • Any abnormality other than glaucoma in the study eye that could affect tonometry.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04468633). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search