Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=473 Randomized Double-blind Prevention

PRescribing INterventions for Chronic Pain Via the Electronic Health Record Study - Opioid-Naive Population

Opioid Use Disorder · Opioid Abuse
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04601493 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
473
Serious AEs
Results posted
Aug 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Opioid Prescription Rate — 0.0159; 0.0141; 0.0161; 0.0120 percent

Summary

The objective of this research is to assess the effects of electronic health record (EHR)-based decision support tools on primary care provider (PCP) decision-making around pain treatment and opioid prescribing. The decision support tools are informed by principles of "behavioral economics," whereby clinicians are "nudged," though never forced, towards guideline-concordant care.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Opioid Prescription Rate
0.0159; 0.0141; 0.0161; 0.0120
SECONDARY
Rate of Non-Opioid Treatment Prescription
0.239; 0.227; 0.23; 0.228
SECONDARY
Opioid Prescription Length
9.63; 11.85; 13.43; 11.75
SECONDARY
Opioid Prescription MME
23.41; 23.89; 21.6; 23.89

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All primary care providers from all of the Fairview and University of Minnesota Physicians study clinics

Exclusion Criteria

  • Primary care providers who work less than 20% full time equivalent (FTE)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04601493). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search