N/A
N=473
PRescribing INterventions for Chronic Pain Via the Electronic Health Record Study - Opioid-Naive Population
Opioid-use Disorder · Opioid Use · Opioid Abuse
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04601493 ↗Enrolled (actual)
473
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Aug 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Opioid Prescription Rate — 0.0159; 0.0141; 0.0161; 0.0120 percent
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Choice Architecture Nudge (Behavioral); PMP Integration & Nudge (Behavioral)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Primary completion
- Oct 2021
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Opioid Prescription Rate |
0.0159; 0.0141; 0.0161; 0.0120 | — |
| SECONDARY Rate of Non-Opioid Treatment Prescription |
0.239; 0.227; 0.23; 0.228 | — |
| SECONDARY Opioid Prescription Length |
9.63; 11.85; 13.43; 11.75 | — |
| SECONDARY Opioid Prescription MME |
23.41; 23.89; 21.6; 23.89 | — |
Summary
The objective of this research is to assess the effects of electronic health record (EHR)-based decision support tools on primary care provider (PCP) decision-making around pain treatment and opioid prescribing. The decision support tools are informed by principles of "behavioral economics," whereby clinicians are "nudged," though never forced, towards guideline-concordant care.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- All primary care providers from all of the Fairview and University of Minnesota Physicians study clinics
Exclusion Criteria
- Primary care providers who work less than 20% full time equivalent (FTE)
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04601493). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.