Phase 4
N=52
Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Brolucizumab 6 mg Dosing Regimens in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Age-related Macular Degeneration
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04679935 ↗Enrolled (actual)
52
Serious AEs
21.2%
Results posted
Jan 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Week 40 to Week 52: LS Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye — 3.24; -0.50; 3.88; -0.27 Letters read
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Interventions
- Brolucizumab (Biological)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Primary completion
- Jan 2024
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Week 40 to Week 52: LS Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye |
3.24; -0.50; 3.88; -0.27; 3.12; -2.23 | — |
| SECONDARY Treatment Intervals Before and During the Study |
54.7; 68.5; 64.8; 77.8; 56.0; 65.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Patients With Prolonged Interval |
18; 12; 13; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Proportion of Patients Who Maintained on q12w Regimen. |
8; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Distribution of Patients at Every 8 Weeks / Every 12 Weeks Intervals - Frequency of Switches in Treatment Intervals Between Baseline and Week 52 |
15; 19; 3; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity |
72.0; 71.6; 74.9; 71.2; 74.8; 69.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Patients With Best-corrected Visual Acuity Improvements of >= 5, >= 10 and >= 15 Letters |
9; 5; 2; 2; 1; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Patients With Best-corrected Visual Acuity >= 69 Letters |
20; 19 | — |
| SECONDARY LS Mean Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline at Week 52 |
2.76; -1.43 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28 and 52 |
-74.0; -8.5; -20.0; -51.0; -21.0; -53.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Central Subfield |
13; 16; 19; 22; 17; 16 | — |
| SECONDARY Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Central Subfield |
5; 6; 13; 18; 18; 12 | — |
| SECONDARY Absence of Sub-retinal Pigment Epithelium Fluid in the Central Subfield |
15; 13; 20; 21; 18; 16 | — |
| SECONDARY Presence of Active Choroidal Neovascularization Leakage |
17; 15; 7; 10; 1; 2 | — |
| SECONDARY Overview of TEAEs |
23; 26; 17; 19; 4; 9 | — |
| SECONDARY Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye by Primary System Organ Class |
17; 19; 16; 17; 0; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye by Preferred Term (at Least 5% in Any Group) |
7; 5; 2; 3; 1; 3 | — |
| SECONDARY Non-ocular TEAEs - Total |
20; 19 | — |
| SECONDARY Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye of Moderate or Severe Intensity |
3; 8; 0; 2; 0; 1 | — |
Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different brolucizumab 6 mg dosing regimens in patients with visual impairment due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who have previously received anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Male or female patients ≥ 50 years of age at screening
- Active choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD that affects the central subfield, including retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) with a CNV component, confirmed by presence of active leakage from CNV seen by fluorescein angiography and sequellae of CNV, e.g. pigment epithelial detachment (PED), subretinal or sub-retinal pigment epithelium (sub-RPE) hemorrhage, blocked fluorescence, macular edema (intraretinal fluid (IRF) and/or subretinal fluid (SRF) and/or sub-retinal pigment epithelium (sub-RPE) fluid that affects the central subfield, as seen by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)) at screening, as confirmed by central reading center (study eye). If active CNV according to the above explained activity criteria is not detectable in screening image data (no IRF and no SRF), presence of residual and/or recurrent fluid (IRF and / or SRF) within the last 6 months before baseline visit is also considered eligible. In this case, historical images must be submitted for analysis by the central reading center.
- Pretreatment with any anti-VEGF drug for a maximum of five years (60 months). Patients should have shown functional and/or anatomical treatment response to the pretreatment(s), prior to participating in this study.
- The treatment initiation phase with the current anti-VEGF must have been completed for at least 6 months with continuous treatment in a ≥ q4w to ≤ q12w injection interval (±2-day window, i.e., 26 to 86 days inclusive) before the baseline visit. At least 4 weeks (minimum 26 days) must have passed between the last anti-VEGF pretreatment and baseline.
- Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score between 83 and 38 letters, inclusive, using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts at both screening and baseline visit (study eye)
Exclusion Criteria
- Any active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation, at screening or baseline (study eye)
- Uncontrolled glaucoma defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 25 mmHg on medication, or according to investigator's judgement, at screening or baseline (study eye)
- Presence of amblyopia, amaurosis or ocular disorders in the fellow eye with BCVA 5 years in the study eye, pretreatment with brolucizumab at any time in the study eye, previous treatment with investigational drugs in the last 6 months, intraocular or periocular steroids at any time, macular laser photocoagulation or photodynamic therapy at any time, peripheral laser photocoagulation within 3 months prior to baseline, intraocular surgery within 3 months prior to baseline, vitreoretinal surgery at any time, aphakia with the absence of posterior capsule (study eye)
- Stroke or myocardial infarction during the 6 month period prior to baseline
- Systemic anti-VEGF therapy during the 3-month period prior to baseline
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04679935). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.