N/A
N=74
Taking Care of Us: A Dyadic Intervention for Heart Failure Couples
Heart Failure
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04737759 ↗Enrolled (actual)
74
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Physical Quality of Life Scores in Couples in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition. — 1.28; -0.03; 0.59; -0.63 units on a scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Taking Care of Us (Behavioral); SUPPORT (Other)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Boston College
- Primary completion
- May 2023
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change in Physical Quality of Life Scores in Couples in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition. |
1.28; -0.03; 0.59; -0.63 | — |
| PRIMARY Change in Mental Quality of Life Scores in Couples in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition. |
0.39; 0.34; 0.50; -0.21 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Depressive Symptom Scores in Couples in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition. |
-5.83; -0.74; -0.44; -0.40 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Care Strain Scores in Spouses in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition. |
-1.72; 1.32 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Heart Failure Related Quality of Life Scores in Persons With Heart Failure in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition |
5.90; -0.82 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Difference in Dyspnea Scores in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition |
-2.06; 0.11; -1.83; 0.47 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Difference in Pain Interference Scores in Couples in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition |
-3.50; 1.68; -1.61; 2.47 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Difference in Fatigue Scores in Couples in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition. |
-2.33; -0.21; -3.06; -0.42 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Collaboration Scores in Couples in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition |
1.13; 0.40; 1.20; 0.28 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Confidence Scores in Couples in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition |
0.33; -0.06; 0.51; -0.23 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Communication Scores on the Active Engagement Subscale in Couples in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition |
1.11; -0.58; 2.17; 0.74 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Communication Scores on the Protective Buffering Subscale in Couples in the TCU vs SUPPORT Condition |
-1.39; 0.05; 0.00; 0.42 | — |
Summary
This research study is evaluating the efficacy and feasibility of a novel, dyadic intervention for heart failure couples versus an educational counseling intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adults with Heart Failure:
- Diagnosis of heart failure for at least three months
- Current heart failure symptoms (i.e., NYHA Class II-III; AHA/ACC Stage C)
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Reachable by telephone/email
- Access to device with camera (e.g., computer, tablet) to participate in Zoom sessions
- Have a co-residing spouse/unmarried partner willing to participate
Inclusion Criteria: Spouses/Partners:
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years
- Co-residing with the adult with heart failure at time of recruitment
- Have lived with the adult with heart failure for at least one year
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Major and uncorrected hearing impairment
- Significant cognitive impairment
- Heart transplantation/mechanical circulatory support prior to enrollment
- Concomitant terminal illness that would impede participation
- Active psychosis or severe substance abuse that would impair the ability to complete the study
- Inability to complete the requirements of the study, including enrolment in an additional trial
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04737759). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.