N/A
N=90
Home-based Resistance Training to Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04755660 ↗Enrolled (actual)
90
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Physical Activity — 59.98; 48.21; 59.43 score on a scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Exercise behavior change for resistance exercise (Behavioral)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
- Primary completion
- Dec 2021
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Physical Activity |
59.98; 48.21; 59.43 | — |
| SECONDARY Hand Grip Strength(kg) |
28; 29.36; 28.22 | — |
| SECONDARY Body Composition |
25.02; 23.87; 24.74; 27.88; 27.09; 27.07 | — |
| SECONDARY Self-efficacy |
2.53; 4.0; 3.72 | — |
| SECONDARY Physical Performance_30-s Chair Stand Test. |
12.35; 13.76; 13.97 | — |
| SECONDARY Hemoglobin A1c |
7.24; 7.16; 7.11 | — |
| SECONDARY Physical Performance _6-meter Walking Speed. |
0.09; 0.18; 0.13 | — |
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare motivational interviews and self-efficacy theory-based exercise behavior and home-based resistance exercise (elastic band to non-elastic band) to improve physical activity, muscle strength, body composition, and self-efficacy of exercise in type 2 diabetic patients. The effectiveness of performance and exercise compliance.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- diabetes type 2
- age >50 years old
- sedentary lifestyle (PASE questionnaire leisure time physical activities score female 15)
- Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease
- Foot ulcer over 6 month
- Severe muscle diseases and rheumatoid arthritis
- Cognitive or mental disorders who cannot understand and cooperate with the exercise plan
- those who are accessed by the doctor to be avoided for exercise
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04755660). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.