Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=3,228 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Comparing Smoking Cessation Interventions Among Underserved Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening

Smoking Cessation

Enrolled (actual)
3,228
Serious AEs
Results posted
Feb 2026
Primary outcome: Primary: Biochemically Confirmed Smoking Abstinence Sustained for 6 Months — 26; 45; 78; 61 Participants — p=0.797

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Removal of Financial Barriers (Behavioral); Financial Incentives (Behavioral); Mobile Health Application (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
Primary completion
Nov 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Biochemically Confirmed Smoking Abstinence Sustained for 6 Months
26; 45; 78; 61 0.797
SECONDARY
Quit Status (Biochemically Confirmed)
58; 85; 133; 90; 37; 56 0.971
SECONDARY
Health-related Quality of Life
10.3; 9.90; 9.33; 9.69; 0.612; 0.645
SECONDARY
Perceived Barriers to Cessation
45.0; 45.5; 43.1; 44.0; 22.4; 22.5
SECONDARY
Self-efficacy Related to Cessation Efforts
26.8; 27.4; 28.8; 27.9
SECONDARY
Motivation to Quit
12; 17; 16; 11; 104; 144
SECONDARY
Temporal ("Delay") Discounting
2.33; 1.79; 1.64; 1.47
SECONDARY
Health-related Quality of Life
10.3; 9.90; 9.33; 9.69; 0.612; 0.645
SECONDARY
Perceived Barriers to Cessation
45.0; 45.5; 43.1; 44.0; 22.4; 22.5
SECONDARY
Self-efficacy Related to Cessation Efforts
26.8; 27.4; 28.8; 27.9
SECONDARY
Motivation to Quit
12; 17; 16; 11; 104; 144
SECONDARY
Temporal ("Delay") Discounting
2.33; 1.79; 1.64; 1.47
SECONDARY
Health-related Quality of Life
10.3; 9.90; 9.33; 9.69; 0.612; 0.645
SECONDARY
Perceived Barriers to Cessation
45.0; 45.5; 43.1; 44.0; 22.4; 22.5
SECONDARY
Self-efficacy Related to Cessation Efforts
26.8; 27.4; 28.8; 27.9
SECONDARY
Motivation to Quit
12; 17; 16; 11; 104; 144
SECONDARY
Temporal ("Delay") Discounting
2.33; 1.79; 1.64; 1.47
SECONDARY
Self-report Cigarette Abstinence
84; 130; 172; 129; 46; 66 0.730
SECONDARY
Self-report Other Tobacco Abstinence
81; 130; 169; 127; 46; 65 0.559

Summary

To compare the effectiveness of four interventions to promote sustained, biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence for 6 months among underserved smokers referred for lung cancer screening at four large U.S. health systems.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Current smoker (≥ 1 cigarettes per day, not including e-cigarettes)
  • Has a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan ordered by their physician
  • Underserved, defined as one or more of the following: (a) Black, (b) Hispanic, (c) rural residence, or (d) low socioeconomic status (Defined as one or both of: high-school education or less, or household income <200% of the federal poverty line)
  • Able to receive study invitation and screening, by virtue of showing up to a radiology location affiliated with a participating health system for the LDCT, or having a valid email address or telephone number on file with the health system
  • Access to a cell phone with text messaging or the internet
  • Aged 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

  • No cell phone
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04798664). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search