Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=56 Randomized Single-blind Screening

Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Decision Guide for Infant Feeding Assessment

Premature Birth · Feeding and Eating Disorders of Childhood

Enrolled (actual)
56
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants That Recommend Feeding Therapy — 27; 27; 1; 1 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Decision Support Tool (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Primary completion
Feb 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants That Recommend Feeding Therapy
27; 27; 1; 1; 26; 25
PRIMARY
Number of Participants That Recommend Referral to Other Providers
27; 25; 1; 3; 27; 25
PRIMARY
Number of Participants That Recommend Referral by Specialty
11; 3; 20; 17; 2; 4
SECONDARY
Number of Participants That Recommend Feeding Therapy Categorized by Number of Times Per Week
8; 3; 19; 24; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants That Recommend Intervention Target Choices
26; 25; 22; 19; 22; 11
SECONDARY
Decision Support Tool Acceptability Score
3.40
SECONDARY
Decision Support Tool Appropriateness Score.
3.37
SECONDARY
Decision Support Tool Feasibility Score.
3.50

Summary

Preterm infants are at risk for feeding problems which can persist through early childhood. These feeding problems may include oral motor, sensory, digestive, nutritional, respiratory, and/or behavioral components. In North Carolina's early intervention program, speech pathologists or occupational therapists are responsible for completing feeding evaluations, and may not know when to refer infants out to medical specialists to address these other domains. This study will test a decision support tool in hypothetical feeding evaluation scenarios. The hypothetical scenarios will consist of real feeding videos of preterm infants who recently participated in a multidisciplinary feeding evaluation. Parent-reported outcomes of the infant's real evaluation will be compared to those of the speech pathologists and occupational therapists in our study who do, and do not, use the decision support tool. The investigators hypothesize that therapists with the tool will make recommendations that are closer to those of the multidisciplinary team, and that they will find the tool useful and easy to use. Due to recruitment limitations with families, the study was adapted in October, 2021 prior to enrollment of subjects to use case studies, rather than infant videos, as the hypothetical situation from which to test the tool. Therapists will then answer clinical questions without using the tool when viewing the first case study, and will use the tool to answer questions when viewing the second case study. Order of case study presentation will be randomized among participants.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • at least 18 years of age,
  • speech language pathologist or occupational therapist,
  • at least 2 years of experience evaluating and treating pediatric feeding,
  • have worked in early intervention in last 5 years,
  • English proficiency,
  • currently reside in North Carolina

Exclusion Criteria

  • <2 years of experience in pediatric feeding,
  • have not worked in Early Intervention in last 5 years,
  • younger than 18 years old
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04850794). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search