N/A
N=56
Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Decision Guide for Infant Feeding Assessment
Premature Birth · Feeding and Eating Disorders of Childhood
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04850794 ↗Enrolled (actual)
56
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants That Recommend Feeding Therapy — 27; 27; 1; 1 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Decision Support Tool (Behavioral)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Primary completion
- Feb 2022
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Participants That Recommend Feeding Therapy |
27; 27; 1; 1; 26; 25 | — |
| PRIMARY Number of Participants That Recommend Referral to Other Providers |
27; 25; 1; 3; 27; 25 | — |
| PRIMARY Number of Participants That Recommend Referral by Specialty |
11; 3; 20; 17; 2; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants That Recommend Feeding Therapy Categorized by Number of Times Per Week |
8; 3; 19; 24; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants That Recommend Intervention Target Choices |
26; 25; 22; 19; 22; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Decision Support Tool Acceptability Score |
3.40 | — |
| SECONDARY Decision Support Tool Appropriateness Score. |
3.37 | — |
| SECONDARY Decision Support Tool Feasibility Score. |
3.50 | — |
Summary
Preterm infants are at risk for feeding problems which can persist through early childhood. These feeding problems may include oral motor, sensory, digestive, nutritional, respiratory, and/or behavioral components. In North Carolina's early intervention program, speech pathologists or occupational therapists are responsible for completing feeding evaluations, and may not know when to refer infants out to medical specialists to address these other domains. This study will test a decision support tool in hypothetical feeding evaluation scenarios. The hypothetical scenarios will consist of real feeding videos of preterm infants who recently participated in a multidisciplinary feeding evaluation. Parent-reported outcomes of the infant's real evaluation will be compared to those of the speech pathologists and occupational therapists in our study who do, and do not, use the decision support tool. The investigators hypothesize that therapists with the tool will make recommendations that are closer to those of the multidisciplinary team, and that they will find the tool useful and easy to use.
Due to recruitment limitations with families, the study was adapted in October, 2021 prior to enrollment of subjects to use case studies, rather than infant videos, as the hypothetical situation from which to test the tool. Therapists will then answer clinical questions without using the tool when viewing the first case study, and will use the tool to answer questions when viewing the second case study. Order of case study presentation will be randomized among participants.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- at least 18 years of age,
- speech language pathologist or occupational therapist,
- at least 2 years of experience evaluating and treating pediatric feeding,
- have worked in early intervention in last 5 years,
- English proficiency,
- currently reside in North Carolina
Exclusion Criteria
- <2 years of experience in pediatric feeding,
- have not worked in Early Intervention in last 5 years,
- younger than 18 years old
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04850794). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.