Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=52 Randomized Other

Comparative Acceptability of Tobacco and Menthol Flavored E-cigarettes

Tobacco Use Disorder

Enrolled (actual)
52
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Questionnaire Scale "Intentions for Future Use" — 3.1; 3.7 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
E-cigarette product (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 21+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center
Primary completion
Aug 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Questionnaire Scale "Intentions for Future Use"
3.1; 3.7
SECONDARY
Questionnaire Scale "Subjective Vaping Experience"
38.0; 48.1
SECONDARY
Questionnaire Scale "Perceptions of Flavor"
34.0; 51.0
SECONDARY
Questionnaire Scale "Product Demand"
38.7; 49.7

Summary

The study is a randomized crossover trial. Current menthol smokers will complete a session with each flavor of an electronic cigarette: menthol and tobacco. The objective of this survey is to assess for flavor preference.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • typically smoking menthol cigarettes
  • Non-Hispanic African American or white/Caucasian,
  • ≥21 years old, smoke 5-30 cigarettes per day,
  • daily cigarette smoker
  • smoked at current rate for at least 6 months
  • interested in trying e-cigarettes
  • not interested in or unable/unwilling to quit cigarette smoking
  • willing to complete one in-person study visits

Exclusion Criteria

  • Interested in quitting cigarettes in the next 30 days
  • use of smoking cessation pharmacotherapy in the past 30 days
  • use of non-cigarette tobacco products in the past 30 days
  • use of e-cigarettes >5x in lifetime
  • use of e-cigarettes ≥4 of the past 30 days
  • weight 10 miles from study site (Fairway CRU)
  • current enrollment is a research study or program that aims to alter tobacco use
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04996940). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search