Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=267 Diagnostic

BEFAST (Bubble-Enhanced FAST) for the Evaluation of Solid Organ Injury

Abdominal Trauma

Enrolled (actual)
267
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Sensitivity of Detecting Solid Organ Injury Measured as the Number of True Positives — 18; 20 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) (Diagnostic_test); Bubble-Enhanced FAST (BEFAST) (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Emory University
Primary completion
Sep 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Sensitivity of Detecting Solid Organ Injury Measured as the Number of True Positives
18; 20
PRIMARY
Specificity of Detecting Solid Organ Injury Measured as the Number of True Negatives
214; 216
PRIMARY
Number of Enrolled Participants With Successful Exams
263; 245
PRIMARY
Percent Agreement Between Raters
82.6; 76.2

Summary

The Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) exam is widely used and accepted as part of advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol, but its low sensitivity for identifying solid organ injury in the absence of hemoperitoneum is a significant limitation. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has the potential to significantly enhance the evaluation of the trauma patient with acute intra-abdominal injury through the use of intravascular microbubbles that allow direct visualization of lacerations to solid organs. European studies have demonstrated that ultrasound contrast markedly improves the sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting solid organ injury, when the exam is performed in the radiology suite. The researchers hypothesize that the bubble-enhanced FAST or BEFAST exam will be more sensitive than traditional FAST for identification of solid organ injury in hemodynamically stable blunt abdominal trauma patients when performed by emergency providers.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Clinical suspicion of intra-abdominal injury
  • Presentation within 24 hours of injury
  • Planned CT of the abdomen/pelvis within 24 hours
  • Ability of patient or legally authorized representative to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Co-existing penetrating abdominal injury
  • Known hypersensitivity reaction to contrast agent
  • Pregnant patients
  • Prisoners
  • No appropriate IV Line able to be inserted
  • Hemodynamic instability at time of enrollment (sustained systolic blood pressure 120 despite initial resuscitation)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05025449). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search