Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=18 Diagnostic

Determining Learning Ability in People With Aphasia

Aphasia

Enrolled (actual)
18
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: SRT Observational Learning Ability — -0.03 Cohen's d

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
SRT Observational Learning (Behavioral); AGL Observational Learning (Behavioral); AGL Rule-based Learning (Behavioral); Standardized cognitive-linguistic assessment (Behavioral); Brain imaging (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
MGH Institute of Health Professions
Primary completion
Sep 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
SRT Observational Learning Ability
-0.03
PRIMARY
AGL Observational Learning Ability
50.08
PRIMARY
AGL Rule-based Learning Ability
63.1
SECONDARY
Standardized Assessment of Cognitive Linguistic Ability - Language Severity
80.5 0.39
SECONDARY
Standardized Assessment of Cognitive Linguistic Ability - Cognitive Composite : Attention
88.77 0.36
SECONDARY
Standardized Assessment of Cognitive Linguistic Ability - Cognitive Composite : Working Memory
51.06 0.64
SECONDARY
Standardized Assessment of Cognitive Linguistic Ability - Cognitive Composite : Executive Function
75.24 0.90
SECONDARY
Percent Spared Tissue Per ROI
88.8; 79.37

Summary

Aphasia is an impairment in the expression or comprehension of language that results from stroke, traumatic brain injury or progressive neurological disease. Approximately two million people in the United States suffer from aphasia, which has profound impacts on quality of life, the ability to return to work and participation in life activities. Research has shown that speech-language therapy, the treatment for aphasia, can significantly improve people's ability to communicate. However, a major limitation in the field of aphasia rehabilitation is the lack of predictability in patients' response to therapy and the inability to tailor treatment to individuals. Currently, aphasia treatments are selected largely based on patient's language abilities and language deficits with little consideration of learning ability, which this study refers to as learning phenotype. Learning phenotype has been used to inform rehabilitation approaches in other domains but is not currently considered in aphasia. The overarching hypothesis of this work is that poor alignment of learning ability and language therapy limits progress for patients and presents a barrier to individualizing treatment. The objectives of the proposed study are to (1) determine the learning phenotype of individuals with aphasia, and (2) examine how lesion characteristics (size and location of damage to the brain), language ability and cognitive ability relate to learning ability. To accomplish objectives, investigators propose to measure implicit (observational) and explicit (rule-based) learning ability in people with aphasia via computer-based tasks. Regression models will be used to examine brain and behavioral factors that relate to learning ability.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Aphasia due to left hemisphere stroke
  • Must be in the chronic stages of aphasia, at least 6 months post onset of stroke
  • Must be between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age
  • Must have near to normal uncorrected or corrected vision per self-report
  • Must be medically and neurologically stable and at least wheelchair ambulatory

Exclusion criteria

  • History of significant psychiatric or medical disease
  • Presence of visual field cuts or visual neglect as determined by the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT; Helm-Estabrooks, 2017) symbol cancellation task
  • Implanted medical devices or metal fragments that are not MRI safe
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05119023). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search