Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=118 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Microcurrent Device (TIVIC Health)

Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Enrolled (actual)
118
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device — 4.9; 5.6; 4.7; 4.8 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Microcurrent TENS device (Device); Sham Device (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Primary completion
Mar 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device
4.9; 5.6; 4.7; 4.8; 4.0; 4.2
PRIMARY
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Second Use of Device
4.4; 5.7; 3.8; 5.0; 3.6; 4.5
PRIMARY
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Third Use of Device
4.7; 4.6; 4.3; 4.3; 3.6; 4.0
PRIMARY
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Fourth Use of Device
4.4; 4.1; 3.6; 4.1; 3.3; 3.5
PRIMARY
Change in Pain Visual Analog Score After Fifth Use of Device
3.6; 4.1; 3.3; 3.8; 3.4; 2.9
PRIMARY
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT 22)
46.5; 37.6; 27.0; 19.2
PRIMARY
Mean Difference in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score
3.8; 3.8
SECONDARY
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score Before Use of Device
4.88; 5.6; 4.71; 4.8; 4; 4.2
SECONDARY
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After First Use of Device
4.47; 5.67; 3.76; 5; 3.59; 4.53
SECONDARY
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Second Use of Device
4.71; 4.6; 4.29; 4.25; 1.82; 2.02
SECONDARY
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Third Use of Device
4.4; 4.06; 3.6; 4.11; 3.33; 3.5
SECONDARY
Debridement Associated Pain Visual Analog Score After Fourth Use of Device
3.75; 4.13; 3.33; 3.8; 3.41; 2.93
SECONDARY
Postoperative Pain Medication Usage
24.3; 16.4; 2.5; 1.5

Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether daily use of a microcurrent neuromodulation device, which applies a small current of electricity to the forehead and maxillary region, will decrease the pain experienced by patients in the days following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). This study is a prospective randomized controlled study. Enrolled subjects will be randomized (1:1) to receive either an active neuromodulation study device or a sham device that appears identical to the active device while emitting no therapeutic microcurrent. Subjects will self-treat with the device at home and will be followed for 2 weeks after FESS.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Scheduled for FESS functional nasal or endoscopic sinus surgery
  • Possessing an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification of I or II
  • Age ≥ 18
  • Possess the capacity to give informed consent
  • Able to read, write and understand English or Spanish
  • Able to attend follow up visits at postop days 7 and 14 Visit 1 (within 0 - day 14) and post-op Visit 2 (within 10 - 21 days)
  • Postop pain VAS ≥ 5 in PACU phase II

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age < 18
  • Does not understand English or Spanish
  • Does not meet inclusion criteria
  • History of chronic pain
  • Experiencing chronic pain requiring opioids at baseline and/or who are under the care of pain management specialists
  • Neurologic disorders (including seizure disorders)
  • Undergoing planned or unplanned additional procedures at the time of FESS surgery
  • In custody of the state
  • Prisoners
  • Known to be pregnant
  • Implanted cranial metallic components or devices including deep brain stimulators or cochlear implants
  • Has an implanted or external worn cardiac device including pacemakers, automated implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD), or any other cardiac electric devices (including non-implanted devices, e.g. defibrillator vest)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05198518). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search