Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=10 Randomized Device Feasibility

A First in Human Study to Compare Feasibility of Inertial Cavitation Irrigation to SNI in Root Canal Treatment.

Root Canal Treatment · Post Operative Pain

Enrolled (actual)
10
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Clinical Postoperative Pain — 30.5; 20.6 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Conventional irrigation (Other); Inertial cavitation (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Lumendo AG
Primary completion
May 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Clinical Postoperative Pain
11.58; 4
PRIMARY
Clinical Postoperative Pain
11.58; 4
PRIMARY
Clinical Postoperative Pain
11.58; 4
PRIMARY
Clinical Postoperative Pain
11.58; 4
PRIMARY
Clinical Postoperative Pain
11.58; 4

Summary

The study design is a single-center 2-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. 10 subjects (teeth) requiring a root canal treatment will be enrolled in 2 groups (5 in each group). The aim of the study is to compare the postoperative pain intensity levels in patients with asymptomatic teeth diagnosed for non-surgical orthograde root canal treatment that are disinfected during the root canal treatment procedure by manual irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution using an endodontic needle or by a inertial cavitation-generating device.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Physical status classification system described was used for patients' recruitment. Healthy patients, who were classified by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) as ASA I and II
  • Patients with the age of 18 and over
  • Patients who were diagnosed as in need of non-surgical orthograde root canal treatment of an asymptomatic tooth
  • Tooth without signs of previously initiated Root Canal Therapy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant and lactating females
  • Patients with chronic periodontal diseases
  • Patients with sensitivity or adverse reactions to any medication or materials that were used throughout the treatment procedure
  • Patients with acute periapical periodontitis
  • Patients with acute periodontal abscess
  • Patients who could not abide by the follow-up time
  • Patients who used analgesics 1-week prior or antibiotics 1-month prior to treatment
  • Uncooperative patients
  • Teeth that cannot be made functional nor restored or difficult to access teeth with no importance (wisdom teeth)
  • Teeth with poor prognosis, for example, due to deep root caries or big root resorption
  • Teeth with more than/or equal 4 mm periodontal pocket depth
  • Teeth with an inaccessible root end
  • Teeth with apical resorption or a radiologically not clearly defined apex
  • Fractured teeth
  • Teeth with immature or open apices
  • Teeth with root apices extending into the maxillary sinus
  • Teeth with external resorption communicating with the pulp
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05374434). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search