Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=692 Randomized Treatment

A Study of Insulin Efsitora Alfa (LY3209590) Compared With Insulin Degludec in Participants With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Injection Therapy

Type 1 Diabetes · Diabetes

Enrolled (actual)
692
Serious AEs
10.0%
Results posted
Jun 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 [Noninferiority Analysis] — -0.51; -0.56 Percentage of HbA1c

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Insulin Efsitora Alfa (Drug); Insulin Degludec (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Primary completion
May 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 [Noninferiority Analysis]
-0.51; -0.56
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26 [Superiority Analysis]
-0.51; -0.56 0.432
SECONDARY
Percentage of Time in the Blood Glucose Range Between 70 and 180 mg/dL [3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L] From Week 23 to Week 26
52.54; 52.85 0.751
SECONDARY
Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Event Rate
1.99; 1.96 0.900
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 [Noninferiority Analysis]
-0.38; -0.40
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
-26.67; -25.45; -24.78; -19.93 0.697
SECONDARY
Glucose Variability
33.72; 33.69; 33.69; 33.18 0.939
SECONDARY
Percentage of Time in the Blood Glucose Range Between 70 and 180 mg/dL [3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L] From Week 49 to Week 52
50.28; 49.74 0.610
SECONDARY
Basal Insulin Dose
199.51; 208.47; 204.37; 211.25 0.155
SECONDARY
Bolus Insulin Dose
21.48; 25.25; 22.62; 26.10 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Total Insulin Dose
343.91; 383.19; 355.66; 391.60 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Basal Insulin Dose to Total Insulin Dose Ratio
56.4; 53.2; 55.4; 52.6 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Hypoglycemia Event Rate
14.03; 11.59 0.016 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
1.71; 1.62; 1.96; 1.85 0.702
SECONDARY
Percentage of Time in Hypoglycemia Range With Blood Glucose <54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L)
0.75; 0.72; 0.74; 0.64 0.681
SECONDARY
Percentage of Time in Hyperglycemia Range With Blood Glucose >180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) From Week 23 to Week 26
44.29; 44.29 0.999
SECONDARY
Percentage of Time in Hyperglycemia Range With Blood Glucose >180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) From Week 49 to Week 52
46.73; 47.56 0.468
SECONDARY
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, Change Version (DTSQc) at Week 26
14.4; 13.2 0.008 sig
SECONDARY
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction as Measured by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, Change Version (DTSQc) at Week 52
14.4; 12.8 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36 v2) Acute Form (Physical-Component and Mental-Component) Scores
0.19; -0.24; 0.48; -0.25; 0.58; 0.36 0.270

Summary

The main purpose of this study is to measure the safety and efficacy of insulin efsitora alfa (LY3209590) compared with insulin degludec in participants with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily injection therapy.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Have a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes for at least 1 year prior to screening
  • Have received treatment with basal-bolus insulin analog multiple daily injection therapy according to the local product label for at least 90 days prior to screening
  • Have an HbA1c value of 7.0% to 10.0%, inclusive, as determined by the central laboratory at screening.
  • Have a body mass index of ≤35 kilogram/square meter (kg/m²)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Have a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, latent autoimmune diabetes, or specific types of diabetes other than type 1 diabetes
  • Have a history of more than 1 episode of severe hypoglycemia, within the 6 months prior to screening.
  • Have a history of more than 1 episode of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar state or coma requiring hospitalization within the 6 months prior to screening.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05463744). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search