Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=120 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Comparison of Two Techniques for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Enrolled (actual)
120
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Incidence of Pillar Pain — 14; 24 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Z-plasty (Procedure); Conventional (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia de Cordoba
Primary completion
Apr 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Incidence of Pillar Pain
5; 9
PRIMARY
Incidence of Pillar Pain
5; 9
SECONDARY
Grip Strength
18.6; 19.1
SECONDARY
Grip Strength
18.6; 19.1
SECONDARY
Pinch Strength
5.4; 5.1
SECONDARY
Pinch Strength
5.4; 5.1
SECONDARY
Clinical BCTQ
1.5; 1.5
SECONDARY
Functional BCTQ
2.2; 2.1
SECONDARY
Clinical BCTQ
1.5; 1.5
SECONDARY
Functional BCTQ
2.2; 2.1

Summary

The main objective of this study is to compare the complete section of the transverse carpal ligament with another median nerve release technique and to determine if the incidence of post-surgical pillar pain is lower for either of the two surgical techniques. As secondary objectives, we also seek to determine if the postsurgical grip and pincer strength and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) score are better for either of the two surgical techniques.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Moderate-severe carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Symptoms that hinder the patient's daily activities
  • Correct conservative treatment without success

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous surgical intervention for carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Traumatic or congenital sequelae of the hand
  • Incompetence to understand the process and the tests to be carried out
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05468814). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search