Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=82 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Thulium vs. Hol:YAG Laser

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05808257 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
82
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Participants With Stone Free Status — 27; 26 Participants

Summary

This is a randomized prospective study to compare stone free rates and operative efficiency of two laser systems used during retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stone disease: 1. A superpulsed thulium fiber laser (thulium) 2. A pulse modulated high power holmium laser (Holmium)

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Stone Free Status
27; 26
SECONDARY
Fragmentation Speed
0.25; 0.29
SECONDARY
Lasing Activity
58.0; 46.1
SECONDARY
Energy Utilization
13.6; 17.7

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergoing single stage unilateral RIRS for total stone burden volume >5mm to 50% on stone analysis
  • Prior ureteroscopy within 6 weeks of current surgery
  • Irreversible coagulopathy
  • Urothelial tumor(s), direct extraction of the stone(s) without needing laser lithotripsy, and failure to reach the stone in the upper urinary tract with the ureteroscope.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05808257). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search