Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=205 Treatment

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability in Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)-Experienced Participants of at Least 50 Years of Age Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) With Virologic Suppression Who Switch to DTG/3TC FDC From BIC/FTC/TAF

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05911360 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
205
Serious AEs
12.7%
Results posted
May 2026
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Greater Than or Equal to (>=)50 Copies/Millilitre (c/mL) at Week 48 — 2 Participants
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked

No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.

Summary

The study aims at evaluating the maintenance of virologic suppression of dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) fixed dose combination (FDC) at Week 48 post-switch from bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) in participants living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) who are of at least 50 years of age and above.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Greater Than or Equal to (>=)50 Copies/Millilitre (c/mL) at Week 48
2 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA >= 50 c/mL at Week 24
14 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA >= 50 c/mL at Week 96
— —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA Less Than (<) 50 c/mL at Week 24
183; 8 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Week 48
177; 26 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Week 96
— —
SECONDARY
Absolute Values for Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4+) Cells Count at Week 24
724.8 —
SECONDARY
Absolute Values for CD4+ Cells Count at Week 48
723.6 —
SECONDARY
Absolute Values for CD4+ Cells Count at Week 96
— —
SECONDARY
Absolute Values for CD4: Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) Ratio at Week 24
1.127 —
SECONDARY
Absolute Values for CD4:CD8 Ratio at Week 48
1.210 —
SECONDARY
Absolute Values for CD4:CD8 Ratio at Week 96
— —
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cells Count at Week 24
733.6; -8.9 —
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cells Count at Week 48
733.6; -16.8 —
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cells Count at Week 96
— —
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in CD4:CD8 Ratio at Week 24
1.167; -0.027 —
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in CD4:CD8 Ratio at Week 48
1.167; 0.030 —
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in CD4:CD8 Ratio at Week 96
— —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Disease Progression (HIV-associated Conditions, AIDS, and Death) Through Week 24
4 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Disease Progression (HIV-associated Conditions, AIDS, and Death) Through Week 48
6 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Disease Progression (HIV-associated Conditions, AIDS, and Death) Through Week 96
— —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Viral Resistance After Meeting Confirmed Virologic Withdrawal (CVW) Criterion
— —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Viral Resistance After Meeting CVW Criterion
— —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs)
17 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment Related Non-serious AEs
— —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
26 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With SAEs
— —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
— —

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Participants living with HIV-1 with documented plasma HIV-1 RNA ]35 percentage [%] direct bilirubin).
  • Participant has estimated creatine clearance <30 millilitres per minute (mL/min) per 1.73 square meter (m^2) using the refitted, race-neutral Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPIcr\_R) method.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05911360). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search