N/A
Completed N=83
The Effectiveness of Multimedia Education on Hypoglycemic Management.
Type2diabetes · Hypoglycemia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06516705 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
83
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2025
Primary outcomePrimary: The Score of Hypoglycemia Knowledge — 5.8; 4.8 score on a scale
Summary
The first phase of the research was to develop tools, including scales and multimedia, and the second phase was to carry out multimedia hypoglycemia education intervention measures. An experimental randomized controlled trial with a repeated measures design was conducted in second phase. Participants in the experimental group receiving multimedia hypoglycemia education and participants in the contrast group receiving conventional hypoglycemia education. Structural questionnaires were used for data collection. The study was to investigate the effectiveness of multimedia hypoglycemia education compared to conventional hypoglycemia education on knowledge, self-care behavior, fear of hypoglycemia, social support, quality of life, nursing hours, education satisfaction, and the recurrence rate of hypoglycemic events among patients with type 2 diabetes.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY The Score of Hypoglycemia Knowledge |
5.8; 4.8 | — |
| PRIMARY The Score of Hypoglycemia Self-care Behavior |
31.2; 28.6 | — |
| PRIMARY Nursing Time |
9.4; 14.8 | — |
| PRIMARY The Score of Education Satisfaction |
22.6; 17.1 | — |
| PRIMARY The Recurrence Rate of Hypoglycemic Events |
16; 19 | — |
| SECONDARY The Score of Fear of Hypoglycemia |
7.0; 5.1 | — |
| SECONDARY The Score of Social Support |
23.0; 21.8 | — |
| SECONDARY The Score of Quality of Life |
52.3; 51.5 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- type 2 diabetes and blood glucose levels below 70 mg/dL
Exclusion Criteria
- patients with cognitive impairment, those who are unable to perform activities of daily living and those with severe or unstable medical conditions.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06516705). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.