Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=54 Randomized Diagnostic

Comparison of Visual Field Assessments Between Three Perimeters

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06539715 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
54
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2026
Primary outcomePrimary: Total Acquisition Time (Both Eyes) — 4.44; 7.34; 7.71 minutes
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked

No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.

Summary

A single center, prospective, randomized, comparative study of visual field assessments between the TEMPO, VisuALL, and HFA perimeters. Subjects will be assessed at 1 visit. Clinical evaluations will include MD, PSD, FT, VFI, OCT, and a questionnaire.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Total Acquisition Time (Both Eyes)
4.44; 7.34; 7.71
SECONDARY
Mean Deviation (MD)
-3.16; -3.28; -4.22
SECONDARY
Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD)
4.78; 4.22; 4.51
SECONDARY
Foveal Threshold (FT)
31.40; 34.71; 27.61
SECONDARY
Patient Questionnaire
53; 28; 45; 48; 16; 40

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients with best-corrected visual outcomes of 20/30 or better.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable to tolerate ophthalmic imaging
  • Any ocular or systemic conditions, that could affect VF test results, such as age-related macular degeneration, peripheral retinal disease, or severe glaucoma.

The principal investigator reserves the right to declare a patient ineligible or non-evaluable based on medical evidence that indicates they are unsuitable for the trial.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06539715). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search