N/A N=28 Adhese One F Upgrade in Direct Filling Therapy
Dental Adhesive
Primary: Number of Participants With Clinical Success — 28 Participants
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=61 Clinical Evaluation of 3M™ ESPE™ Adper™ Scotchbond™ SE Self-Etch Adhesive in Class I and Class II Restorations in Adults
Dental Caries
Primary: Percentage of Restorations Scoring Alpha — 100; 96 percentage of Alpha scores — p=0.05
N/A N=70 Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment
Dental Caries
Primary: Color Match — 53; 54; 50; 52 teeth
N/A N=24 Clinical Evaluation Of A New Two-Component Self-Etch Universal Adhesive
Composite Restorations · Tooth Lesions
Primary: Retention — 100; 100; 100; 97 percentage of restorations
N/A N=38 NCCL Direct Composite Restoration Performance With Self-Etch and Multimode Adhesives
Dental Adhesives/Restorations Performance
Primary: Esthetic, Functional and Biological Clinical Performance Adhesive/Adhesion Mode of NCCLs Restoration, Graded on a 5-point Scale, Using FDI Criteria at 24 Month Follow-up…
N/A N=66 Clinical Evaluation of a Universal Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesions
Cervical Lesions
Primary: Retention of Restorations — 38; 38; 37; 37 Non-carious cervical lesions
N/A N=68 Clinical Performance of Chairside CAD/CAM Restorations
Dental Cements · Caries,Dental
Primary: Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores] — 40; 40; 0; 0 Restorations
N/A N=72 Esthetics of Dental Composite and Adhesive System
Cavities of Teeth
Primary: Patient Satisfaction of the Restoration's Appearance (Esthetics) Using the Visual Analog Scale — 85; 79 units on a scale
N/A N=135 Evaluate the Effectiveness of an Experimental Urethane Dimethacrylate Resin Based Dental Composite Material
Dental Caries · Restorative Material
Primary: Percent of Teeth With Anatomic Form Graded as A or B. — 42; 37; 40; 2 teeth — p=0.2552
N/A N=72 Outcome Evaluation of Ceramic Crowns Using Two Different Dental Cements
Sensitivity to Dental Cements · Dental Crowns · Dental Three-unit Bridges
Primary: Incidence of Post-operative Pain (Yes/no) — 1; 0; 1; 2 participants — p=0.5637
N/A N=83 Evaluation of a Experimental Denture Adhesive to Prevent Food Ingress
Denture Retention
Primary: Combined Mass of Peanuts (Gram) (From Upper and Lower Dentures) for Reference Denture Adhesive and on no Adhesive Use — 0.06; 0.08 gram (g) — p=0.0987
N/A N=44 A Clinical Bite Force Study of Two Marketed Adhesives Against no Adhesive
Denture Retention
Primary: Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for the Incisal Bite Force (Positive Control Adhesive Versus [vs.] Negative Control) — 4.78; 2.03 lbs — p=<.0001
N/A N=102 Scotchbond Universal Plus Compared to Scotchbond Universal for Posterior Class I & II Restorations With Filtek Universal
Cavities of Teeth · Dental Decay
Primary: Retention of Restorative Material — 97; 100; 3; 0 percentage of restorations
N/A N=23 A Bite Force Study Comparing Two New Test Adhesives With Currently Marketed Denture Adhesive
Denture Retention
Primary: Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB0-12) for Test Adhesive 1 Versus (vs.) No Adhesive — 2.09; 1.43 lbs — p=0.1770
N/A N=49 Evaluation of a "Flash-free" Adhesive Resin for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding
Malocclusion
Primary: Bonding Time — 42.5; 67.7 seconds
N/A N=64 Scotchbond Universal Plus Compared to Scotchbond Universal With Filtek Universal Restorative to Restore Class V NCCLs
Class V Non-carious Cervical Dental Lesions
Primary: Retention of Restorative Material — 83; 85; 17; 15 percentage of restorations
N/A N=159 Clinical Performance of Incremental and Bulk Fill Composites in Class II Restorations
Dental Caries
Primary: Percent Acceptable Restorations — 94.6; 96.4; 92.9 percentage of restorations survived — p=0.686
N/A N=93 High-strength Glass-ionomer Dental Restorations
Dental Caries
Primary: Survival Rate — 39; 44; 5; 2 Restorations — p=0.262
Phase 3 N=119 To Evaluate Oral Health and Quality of Life Associated With Use of a Denture Adhesive
Denture Retention
Primary: Gum Health Analysis by Change From Baseline in Overall Mean Scores of Participant Responses to the Gum Comfort Questionnaire After 12 Weeks — 4.1; 4.5; -0.6; -0.4 Score…
N/A N=60 Clinical Study on a New Flowable Composite as a Restorative in Adult Teeth
Dental Caries
Primary: Clinical Performance by Cvar & Ryge Scores — 96.6; 88.3; 100.0; 100.0 percent of teeth — p=0.8
N/A N=53 Use of Two Dissolvable Therapeutics Under Removable Partial Dentures
Edentulous Jaw · Edentulous Mouth
Primary: Change From Baseline in Patient Comfort for as Assessed by Numerical Scale. — 0.99; 1.16 units on a scale
N/A N=36 In Vivo Assessment of the Tooth-Resin Composite Interface Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Cavity · Cavities of Teeth
Primary: Marginal Staining: World Dental Federation (FDI) Criteria - Baseline — 18; 18; 0; 0 Participants
N/A N=60 Survival of Endocrowns Made From Different Ceramics
Pulp Disease, Dental · Dental Caries · Dental Leakage
Primary: Survival of Dental Prosthesis — 19; 14; 17 Teeth
N/A N=184 Clinical Performance of Two Fissure Sealants
Caries Pit and Fissure Limited to Enamel
Primary: Retention of the Sealant — 0; 0; 164; 164 Sealants
N/A N=168 Comparison of 2 Different Resin Based Filling Materials in Posterior Teeth - a Multicenter Study
Caries · Unsatisfactory or Defective Restoration of Tooth
Primary: Score for Surface Luster — 1.89; 1.62 scores on a scale
N/A N=102 Clinical Evaluation of Kerr SonicFill™ 2 vs 3M ESPE Filtek™ Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative
Dental Caries
Primary: Change in Esthetic Properties: Number of Teeth, Rated 1 (Most Desirable Outcome) to 5 (Least Desirable Outcome), in Each Esthetic Category — 25; 25; 2; 2 Teeth
Phase 3 N=43 A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Maximum Maxillary Bite Force (BF) When Using Two Novel Denture Adhesives Compared to Using No-Adhesive
Denture Retention
Primary: Area Over Baseline Over 12 Hours (AOB 0-12) to Compare Maximum Incisal Bite Force — 0.87; 0.69; 0.89; 0.59 lbs — p=0.037
N/A N=17 Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of Nano-hybrid-composite Denture Teeth
Edentulous Mouth · Dental Prosthesis Failure
Primary: Survival Rate of Dentures With SR Phonares II Teeth — 17 Participants
N/A N=50 Clinical Investigation of the F-Composite 2 System in Direct Filling Therapy
Dental Caries · Unsatisfactory or Defective Restoration of Tooth
Primary: Percentage of Restored Teeth With Postoperative Sensitivity — 7 percentage restored hypersensitive teeth
N/A N=50 Nobio Clinical Study - Demineralization Prevention With a New Antibacterial Restorative Composite
Dental Caries · Denture, Partial, Removable
Primary: Mineral Loss ΔZ — 235; 774 vol% * μm]