N/A N=200 Prevalence of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Asymptomatic Patients
Femoroacetabular Hip Impingement Syndrome
Primary: Prevalence of Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI) — 28; 172 Participants
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=80 A Physical Therapy Program Versus Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Randomized Clinical Trial
Femoroacetabular Impingement
Primary: Hip Outcome Score - ADL Subscale at 24 Months — 69.3; 73.1 score on a scale
N/A N=82 Postoperative Hip Bracing After Hip Arthroscopy
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome · Acetabular Labral Tear
Primary: Patient Numerical Pain Ranking Scale (NPRS) — 1.8; 2.3 score on a scale
N/A N=52 Retrospective Study on Radiological Factors Predictive of Psoas Impingement
Hip Impingement Syndrome · Prosthetic Complication
Primary: Acetabular Cup Antiversion — 19.8; 11.5 degree
N/A N=46 Movement Pattern Training in People With Intra-articular, Prearthritic Hip Disorders
Chronic Hip Joint Pain · Prearthritic Hip Disease
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Are Adherent to Treatment Attendance — 21; 22 Participants — p=1.0
N/A N=50 Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Intraoperative Nerve Infiltration During Anterior Hip Replacement Surgery
Pain, Postoperative
Primary: Postoperative Pain During PACU Admission — 40; 36 units on a scale
Phase 4 N=84 Hip Scope Fascia-iliaca (FI) Block Study
Hip Dysplasia · Femoroacetabular Impingement · Acetabular Labrum Tear
Primary: Visual Analog Scale — 2.65; 2.50 units on a scale
Phase 4 N=122 Fascia Iliaca Blocks for Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty
Arthritis of Hip
Primary: Averaged Pain Score — 3.75; 4.11 score on a scale
N/A N=33 Comparing Rehabilitation Programs for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
Primary: Visual Analog Pain Scale (Describing Worst Pain Felt During the Past Week) — 4.5; 4.2 centimeter
N/A N=1,108 Using Alternative Implants for the Surgical Treatment of Hip Fractures (The FAITH Study)
Femoral Neck Fractures
Primary: Revision Surgery — 107; 117 Participants
Phase 4 N=80 A Prospective Analysis of Preoperative Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Arthroscopy
Muscle Weakness | Patient · Pain
Primary: Numeric Pain Score — 7; 6 units on the numeric rating scale (0-10)
N/A N=33 Reliability of Sacral Slope, Pelvic Femoral Motion and Cup Ante-inclination on AP Pelvic Radiographs in Healthy Pts
Healthy
Primary: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for Consistency in Spinopelvic Radiographic Measurements. — .956; .956; .974; .974 Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
N/A N=15 Functional Movement Retraining After Hip Replacement
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Primary: Change in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (HOOS) - Activities of Daily Living Scale — -6.00 units on a scale
N/A N=190 Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell Revision Study
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Primary: Number of Hips Requiring Revision or Pending Revision of the Acetabular Shell (as Defined by Radiographic Parameters) Due to Instability or Lack of Fixation — 4 hips
N/A N=54 Evaluation of X-ray, Acetabular Guides and CT in THR
Total Hip Replacement
Primary: Acetabular Cup Anteversion Angle — 5.8; 3.7 degree
N/A N=61 Load Modification Versus Standard Exercise for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome
Hip Injuries · Pain · Therapy/Rehabilitation
Primary: Global Rating of Change — 7; 3; 16; 21 Participants — p=0.879
N/A N=30 THA Kinematics and Sound for Subjects Implanted Using Various Surgical Approaches
Hip Injuries
Primary: Kinematics - Swing Phase Separation — 0.9; 0.6; 1.0 mm
N/A N=194 Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With iFuse Implant System (SIFI)
Degenerative Sacroiliitis · Sacroiliac Joint Disruption
Primary: Subject Success — 80.5 percentage of participants
N/A N=68 Ceramic-on-ceramic THA for Post-traumatic Hip Osteoarthritis After Acetabular Fracture
Hip Osteoarthritis · Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis
Primary: Survival Rates of the Hip Implants — 96.3 percentage of non-revised implants
N/A N=266 Actis Total Hip System 2 Year Follow-up
Osteoarthritis · Traumatic Arthritis · Rheumatoid Arthritis
Primary: Harris Hip Score- THA Subjects Per Protocol at 2 Years — 95.7 units on a scale
N/A N=21 THA Kinematics and Sound for Subjects for Normal, Diseased and Implanted Hips
Hip Injuries
Primary: Magnitude of Hip Separation During Primary Heel Strike — -0.591; 0.096; 0.558 mm
N/A N=1,495 Comparing Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hemi-Arthroplasty on Secondary Procedures and Quality of Life in Adults With Displaced Hip Fractures
Hip Fractures · Femoral Neck Fractures
Primary: Number of Participants With Revision Surgery — 57; 60 Participants
Phase 2 N=16 Study to Evaluate a Procedure for Intra-articular Injection of FX006 in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip
Osteoarthritis, Hip
Primary: Number of Patients With Successful Study Drug Administrations — 12 Participants
N/A N=150 Biomechanical Reconstruction of Three Different Hip Stem Designs in Hip Dysplasia Using a 3D CT-based Planning Software
Dysplasia; Hip
Primary: Correct Reconstruction CLS — 138 Hips
N/A N=74 LFIT™ Anatomic CoCr Femoral Heads With X3® Polyethylene Insert Study
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Primary: Linear Wear Rate — 0.008 mm/year
N/A N=50 Lumbar Plexus Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block After Hip Arthroscopy
Hip Arthroscopy · Nerve Block
Primary: Pain Score Change — 3; 1.72 change in score on a scale
N/A N=189 R3 Delta Ceramic Acetabular System PAS U.S.
Degenerative Joint Disease
Primary: Overall Study Success at 3 Years Postoperative — 100; 13 Participants
N/A N=117 Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis
Acetabular Fracture · Heterotopic Ossification
Primary: Number of Participants With Severe HO Formation — 3; 9 Participants
N/A N=148 Pending Failure in Hard-hard Total Hip Arthroplasty
Infection and Inflammatory Reaction
Primary: Number of Participants With Chromium and Cobalt Ion Levels Above 7ug/l — 14; 0 participants above limit
N/A N=120 Assessment of the Safety and the Performance of the SAGITTA EVL R Stems in Hip Arthroplasties
Hip Arthropathy
Primary: Survival Rate of Stems — 94 Percentage of stem unrevised