N/A N=27 Implant Placement With Simultaneous Gum Grafting
Edentulous
Primary: Soft Tissue Thickness Over the Implant — 0.6; 0.4 mm
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=32 Bone Remodeling After Immediate Implant Placement With and Without Bone Grafting
Tooth Loss
Primary: Mean Bucco-Lingual Change at 3mm — -0.84; -1.01 mm
N/A N=27 A Prospective Study: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Tenting Screws, Acellular Dermal Matrix and Combination Particulate Grafts
Dental Alveolus · Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic
Primary: Gain in Horizontal Ridge Dimension — 3.33; 3.09 gain in ridge width (mm)
Phase 3 N=39 CATER: Comprehensive Alveolar and Tooth Esthetic Replacement
Dental Implant Failure Nos
Primary: Percent Change in Volume of Alveolar Ridge as Measured by 3D Intraoral Scanning — 15.5; 16.8 percentage of volume change
N/A N=41 Case Selection and Treatment Protocol for Immediate Dental Implants in the Esthetic Zone
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially · Acquired Absence of Single Tooth
Primary: Mid Facial Mucosal Level at Implant Site — 0.36; 0.49 mm
Phase 4 N=46 Esthetic Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Combine With Soft Tissue Augmentation
Dental Implant · Immediate Dental Implant · Soft Tissue Augmentation
Primary: Change in Ridge Dimension — -1.65; -1.87; -1.44; -1.37 millimeters (mm)
Phase 4 N=20 Comparison of Two Different Surgical Approaches To Increase Peri-Implant Mucosa Thickness
Tooth Loss · Peri-implant Mucosa Defect
Primary: Change in Buccal Peri-implant Mucosa Thickness Between Baseline and 16 Weeks After Surgery — 0.44; 0.05 millimeters
N/A N=44 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Porcine and Bovine Xenograft Materials
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 31.27; 36.21 % vital bone
N/A N=14 To Compare Free Gingival Grafts and Connective Tissue Grafts Around Implants With Lack of Keratinized Mucosa
Dental Implants · Alveolar Mucosa
Primary: The Increase in Keratinized Mucosa (in mm) Between the Two Grafts — 3.29; 1.29 mm
N/A N=24 Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft
Clinical Efficacy
Primary: Horizontal Ridge Dimension — -1.6; -0.3 mm
Phase 4 N=17 Treatment of Post-Extraction Dehisced Socket - A Case Series Study
Tooth Loss
Primary: Bone Volumetric Reduction From Baseline to 20 Weeks Post-extraction — 73.26 mm3
N/A N=43 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Two Mineralized Cancellous Bone Allografts
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 27.19; 24.08 percentage
N/A N=101 Short Implants - An Alternative to Bone Grafting?
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Primary: Implant Survival Rate — 66; 70 Implants
N/A N=41 An Assessment of Bone Augmentation in Post-Extraction Sockets
Unrestorable Dentition · Post-Extraction Sockets
Primary: Bone-fill in Grafted Post-extraction Sockets Versus Bone-fill in Non-grafted Post-extraction Sockets — 0.43; 0.27; 0.36; 0.28 mm
N/A N=46 Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Bone Augmentation
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 32.63; 47.41 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=22 Bone Augmentation Techniques in Extraction Sockets
Tooth Loss
Primary: Changes in Hard Tissue Composition — 35.82; 31.76 mm
Phase 4 N=32 Guided Bone Regeneration Around Immediate Implants
Missing Tooth
Primary: Change in Thickness of Buccal Bone — .73; .86; .63; .66 millimeters
N/A N=51 CopiOs® Pericardium Membrane for Localized Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Defect
Primary: Change in Horizontal Ridge Widths From Baseline to 6 Months — 2.61 mm
N/A N=62 The Use of Alloderm Versus Dermacell in Immediate Implant Based Breast Reconstruction
Breast Reconstruction
Primary: Postoperative Duration of Drain Placements — 9.2; 10.8 days — p=0.15
N/A N=66 Histological Evaluation of Healing Following Ridge Preservation Using a Combined Cortical/Cancellous Mineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 26.4; 24.5; 28.8 percentage of total area
N/A N=39 Healing Dynamics in Human Extraction Sockets Grafted With Bio-Oss Collagen®
Tooth Loss
Primary: Number of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 3 Years After Implant Placement — 3; 6; 7 participants
Phase 2 N=18 Cell Therapy for Craniofacial Bone Defects
Cleft Palate · Trauma
Primary: Bone Regeneration — 1.5; 3.3 implant sites
N/A N=45 Assessment of Ridge Preservation Using Moldable Beta-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Grafting System
Dental Implants · Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Primary: Change in Radiographic Measurements of Ridge Dimension (Horizontal Ridge Width) — 1.26; 1.28 mm
N/A N=9 A Histomorphometric Analysis Following Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Bone Graft Materials.
Missing Teeth
Primary: Percentage of New Vital Bone. — 16.33; 26.11; 30.5; 39.67 percentage of new vital bone
N/A N=24 To Compare Different Soft Tissue Grafts at the Time of Lateral Ridge Augmentation Procedure.
Bone Graft; Complications, Infection or Inflammation · Ridge Deficency · Dental Implant
Primary: Measure Changes Clinically in Crestal Soft Tissue Thickness (in mm) — 1.96; 1.59; 0.33 mm
Phase 2 N=1 5-fluorouracil Versus Placebo in Periocular Full Thickness Skin Grafts
Ectropion · Skin Neoplasms
Primary: Graft Size Change — 10 percent change in graft
Phase 3 N=26 Changes of Soft and Hard Tissues After Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs. L-PRF Clot
Alveolar Bone Loss · Tooth Loss
Primary: Overall Horizontal Change in Alveolar Ridge Width — -1.34; -2.21 Millimeters
N/A N=44 Histological Comparison of Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized FDBA Alone Versus a Combined Mineralized-Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 24.7; 36.2 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=4 Amnion-Chorion Allograft Barrier Used for Root Surface and Guided Tissue Regeneration
Periodontal Diseases
Primary: Probing Depth Change — 4.22 millimeter
N/A N=58 An Implant With an Acid-etched Fixture Surface and Internal-hex Collar May Achieve Greater Osseointegration.
Jaw, Edentulous · Dental Implant
Primary: Comparison of Quantitative Bone Healing — -1.18; -1.01; -0.91 mm — p=<0.05