30 closest matches · ranked by relevance
Post-operative Excessive Scarring
Primary: Modified Manchester Scar Scale (MMSS) Score — 8; 11.5 score on a scale
Fibrosis · Skin Scarring · Skin Wound
Primary: Change in Scar Pliability Between the Treated and Control Incision Sites as Measured by Skin Elasticity at 6 Months Compared to Baseline
Skin Cancer
Primary: MMSS for Scar Halves Treated — 8.4; 8.7 score on a scale
Scarring · Impaired Wound Healing
Primary: Time to Complete Wound Closure Collagenase Santyl and Vehicle — 12.9; 13.0 Days — p=<0.05
Hypertrophic
Primary: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) — 2.90; 3.29 score on a scale
Reduction of Hypertrophic Skin Scarring
Primary: Physician Global Assessment Using Physician Overall Opinion Question of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) — 4.00; 4.68; 4.61; 4.86 units on scale…
Keloid
Primary: Change in Keloid Surface Area — 0.455; -0.039 cm2
Suture Related Complication
Primary: The Measured Difference in POSAS and VAS Scores Between 7-day and 10-day Groups — 12.9; 16.1; 19.5; 20.3 score on a scale
Scars
Primary: Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) - PI Assessment — 4.4; 4.5 score on a scale
Scar · Skin Scarring · Skin Cancer
Primary: Cosmetic Outcome — 7.4; 6.6; 6.3; 6.00 score on a scale
Surgical Scar · Breast Augmentation · Abdominoplasty
Primary: Improvement of Surgical Scars at 12 Months Compared to Baseline (Pre-treatment) as Evaluated by 3 Independent Blinded Reviewers Using the General Aesthetic Improvement…
Mohs Surgery
Primary: Assessment of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Change (Values From 0 (Worst) to 10 (Best)) — 0; 50 Percentage reporting improvement
Keloid Scar
Primary: Change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Score From Baseline to Final Visit — -20; -20.6 score on a scale
Cicatrix · Dermabrasion · Coagulation, Laser
Primary: Safey Data Score Based on Ordinal Ratings of Erythema, Edema, Bleeding, Eschar After Resurfacing — 1.33; 3.00; 0; 0 units on a scale
Scarring Due to Treatment
Primary: Post-operative Scarring - Erythema — 1.67; 1.70; 1.50; 1.65 score on a scale — p=0.48
Post-Surgical Scars
Primary: Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) — 17.69; 11.2; 15.2; 11.4 units on a scale — p=0.019
Cicatrix · Carbon Dioxide Laser
Primary: Change in Vectra Measured Length V1 (Month 0)-V2 (Month 3) for Original Group; Visit 3 (Month 6) to Visit 4 (Month 9) for Crossover Group — 0.10; 0.03 mm
Burn Scar · Skin Graft Scar
Primary: Contracture of Scar Surface Area (Percentage of Original Area) — 97; 97 percentage
Cicatrix, Hypertrophic
Primary: Number of Participants With Improvement Assessed Using the VAS Scar Scoring System — 22 Participants
Hypertrophic
Primary: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) — 3.78; 5.58 Units on a scale
Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring
Primary: Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score at Week 24 — 0.0; -0.5; 0.8; -0.3 units on a scale — p=1.000
Acne Scars - Mixed Atrophic and Hypertrophic
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Erythema — -1.687; 5.730 units on a scale
Scar
Primary: Scar Pain — 1.265; 1.181; 1.048; 1.084 units on a scale — p=0.0492
Scar Prevention
Primary: Part B: Expert Panel Scar Assessment Score — -3.16; 0.18; 1.45; 2.91 millimeters
Hypertrophic Surgical Scar
Primary: Change From Baseline in Vancouver Scar Scale Score(VSS) at 3 Months — -3.80; -2.61 units on a scale
Hypertrophic Scarring After Burn Injury
Primary: Pressure Under Compression Garment — 25; 6.4 mm Hg
Scar Prevention
Primary: Expert Panel Scar Assessment Score at Week 12: Part B — 37.8; 42.1 millimeter — p=0.168
Keloid Scar
Primary: To Assess the Impact of an Educational Lecture on Knowledge About Keloid Scars by Comparing Mean Scores Between Knowledge Assessment Questionnaires Administered Before…
Stretch Marks · Striae Distensae · Cosmetic Appearance of Stretch Marks
Primary: Cosmetic Outcome- Fraction Improving by at Least 1 Point Increase in Overall Appearance of Stretch Marks — 3; 5 Participants
Keloid
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With Confirmed Keloid Formation at Treated vs. Untreated Lesions at 24 Weeks — 92.9; 85.7 percentage of participants