N/A N=24 Image Quality Assessment for Screening and Diagnostic Mammography
Breast Health
Primary: Number of Participants With Acceptable Overall Clinical Image Quality — 14; 9 Participants
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
Phase 4 N=615 Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as an Alternative to MRI
Breast Cancer
Primary: Cancer Detection Rate (CDR) Per 1,000 Screenings — 8.3; 18.3 CDR per 1,000 screenings
N/A N=132 Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography vs. MRI for Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer
Primary: Area Under the Curve for Cancer Detection Rates of CESM Compared With Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening — 0.91; .91 Probability of malignancy
N/A N=107 Image Evaluation of Philips Philips MammoDiagnost DR Full Field Digital Mammography System (FFDM)
Breast Cancer
Primary: FFDM (Full Field Digital Mammography) Mammogram Scores — 12; 0 FFDM Mammogram set
N/A N=1,638 Low Dose Molecular Breast Imaging as a Screening Tool for Women With Dense Breasts
Breast Cancer
Primary: Cancer Detection Rate Per 1000 Women Screened, by Breast Density — 3.2; 12.0; 10.7; 0 cancers per 1000 women screened — p=<0.001
N/A N=969 Molecular Breast Imaging as a Screening Tool for Women With Dense Breasts
Breast Cancer
Primary: Diagnostic Yield — 3.2; 9.6; 10.7 cancers per 1000 women screened — p=.016
N/A N=2,978 Molecular Breast Imaging and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Screening Patients With Dense Breast Tissue
Breast Carcinoma
Primary: Rate of Detection of Invasive Cancers — 9; 14 Participants
N/A N=1,232 Acquisition of Breast Mammography Images
Breast Cancer
Primary: Number of Participants for Whom Study Image Data Were Collected — 642; 124; 244 Participants
N/A N=1,085 Assessment of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) in the Screening Environment
Breast Abnormalities
Primary: Number of Participants Without Cancer Who Were Recalled — 274 participants
N/A N=558 Comparison of Full-Field Digital Mammography With Digital Breast Tomography for Screening Call-Back Rates
Breast Neoplasms
Primary: Recall Rate in Group A Participants — 29; 34; 472; 467 Participants — p=0.46
N/A N=764 Evaluation of the Efficacy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Imaging
Breast Cancer
Primary: Efficacy Based on the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve in Breasts Analyzed With DBT as an Adjunct to FFDM vs. FFDM Alone — 0.8527; 0.7516…
N/A N=6,266 Assessment of Periodic Screening of Women With Denser Breast Using WBUS and DBT
Breast Cancer
Primary: Cancer Yield Per 1,000 — 5.0; 6.3; 4.9; 5.9 Cancer yield per 1,000 — p=0.005
N/A N=23 Computed Tomography Versus Standard 2D Mammography Versus 3D Tomosynthesis
Breast Cancer
Primary: Beta of CT Coronal View — 1.75 power-law slope(B)
N/A N=36,444 Surveillance Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer Assessment
Breast Cancer
Primary: Number of Breast Cancers Detected — 279; 27 cancers detected
N/A N=89 Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Breast Cancer Staging in Patients Referred for a Second Opinion
Breast Carcinoma · Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Primary: Accuracy of CEM for Incremental Cancer Detection in the Ipsilateral and Contralateral Breasts. — 41.4 % of malignancy in new CEM lesions
N/A N=1,704 Radiologic Evaluation and Breast Density (READ)
Breast Cancer
Primary: Mammogram Recall for Additional Imaging — 11.3; 12.3; 9.8 percentage of women recalled
N/A N=460 Comparing Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) to Conventional and Abbreviated Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer
Primary: Diagnostic Accuracy of Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) in Comparison to Conventional Breast MRI for Detection of Breast Cancer in the Screening Population. — 34; 0…
N/A N=29,453 The Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Trial in Bergen
Breast Neoplasms
Primary: Number of Participants With Screen-Detected Breast Cancer — 95; 87 Participants
N/A N=128 Study of Dual-energy (DE) Contrast-enhanced (CE) Digital Mammography
Breast Cancer
Primary: Percent Accuracy of Contrast Mammography — 100; 67 percentage of accuracy
N/A N=496 Breast Cancer Detection: Comparison of Breast Tomosynthesis and Conventional Mammography
Breast Cancer
Primary: Detection of Breast Cancer (Sensitivity)
N/A N=5,498 A Randomized Trial of Letters From Family Physicians to Encourage Screening Mammography in Overdue Women
Breast Cancer
Primary: Percentage of Overdue Women Returning for Screening Mammography — 24.0; 34.4 percentage of participants
N/A N=442 Case Collection Study to Support Digital Mammography Image Software Change
Breast Cancer
Primary: Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve to Compare Diagnostic Accuracy of 2 Algorithms in Breast Cancer Diagnosis — 0.884; 0.880 probability
N/A N=193 Positron Emission Mammography and Standard Mammography in Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer
Primary: Frequency of Breast Imaging Assessment Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) "0" Call-back in Mammography vs Breast Imaging Assessment Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)…
N/A N=408 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial Using Imaging
Prostate Neoplasm
Primary: The Proportion of Men With a Positive MRI Defined by a Score of 3 or Greater — 17.7 Percentage of participants
Phase 4 N=72 Intra-operative Digital vs. Standard Mammography
Breast Cancer
Primary: Comparison of Operative Time Savings — 48.5; 54; 68; 74 Minutes — p=0.716
N/A N=100 Pilot Mammography Reader Study to Assess Breast Cancer Detection in FFDM Plus DBT Versus FFDM Alone
Breast Cancer
Primary: Compare Per Subject Area Under Curve (AUC): FFDM Only vs DBT Plus FFDM — 100; 100 Probability
N/A N=20 Tactile Breast Imaging Sensor for Tumor Malignancy Characterization
Breast Cancer
Primary: Size Error in Millimeters — 0 milimeters
N/A N=3,521 Multicenter Hologic Tomosynthesis Study
Breast Cancer
Primary: To Demonstrate Non-inferior ROC Performance as Measured by the Area Under the Curve When Comparing 3-Ds Plus 3-D Images to the 2-D Images. — 0.907; 0.867 Proportion…
N/A N=82 Evaluation of Half-Dose Molecular Breast Imaging With Wide Beam Reconstruction Processing
Breast Cancer
Primary: Compare the Diagnostic Accuracy of 8 mCi Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI) With 4 mCi MBI. — 30; 29 cancers detected
N/A N=72 The Prone to Supine Breast MRI Trial
Breast Cancer
Primary: Number of Successful Segmentation of Supine MRI Images — 54; 61 Participants