Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Spinal anesthesia associated with lower recurrence than general anesthesia in non-muscle invasive bladder cancerSpinal anesthesia linked to lower bladder cancer recurrence rates in single hospital study

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider spinal anesthesia's association with lower recurrence in NMIBC, but note progression difference was not significant.

A randomized controlled trial at Seoul National University Hospital compared spinal anesthesia (SA) with intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine versus general anesthesia (GA) with propofol/fentanyl induction and volatile maintenance in 287 patients undergoing transurethral resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. The primary outcome was disease recurrence at 2 years, with secondary assessment of progression.

In the modified intention-to-treat analysis (272 patients), recurrence rates were 26.8% with SA versus 39.6% with GA. In the full intention-to-treat population, recurrence was 27.4% with SA versus 39.8% with GA. Disease progression occurred in 7.8% of SA patients versus 15.2% of GA patients, though this difference was not statistically significant. Statistical measures (p-values, confidence intervals) for these comparisons were not reported.

Fifteen patients required alternative anesthesia due to clinical needs (SA failure or significant obturator reflex). Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The study was conducted at a single center, and the lack of statistical reporting for key outcomes limits interpretation. While SA was associated with numerically lower recurrence, the non-significant progression difference and single-center design suggest these findings should be viewed as preliminary.

Researchers at Seoul National University Hospital studied whether the type of anesthesia used during bladder cancer surgery affects whether the cancer comes back. They followed 287 patients with early-stage bladder cancer for two years after a procedure to remove tumors. Half received spinal anesthesia (a numbing injection in the back) and half received general anesthesia (being put fully to sleep).

The main finding was that cancer came back less often in patients who had spinal anesthesia. The recurrence rate was about 27% in the spinal group compared to about 40% in the general anesthesia group. The study also looked at whether the cancer got worse, but the difference between groups for this outcome was not strong enough to be considered statistically significant.

It's important to be careful with these results. Fifteen patients in the study had to switch from spinal to general anesthesia during surgery for medical reasons, which shows spinal anesthesia isn't right for everyone. This was also a study at just one hospital, so the results need to be confirmed in larger, multi-center research. For now, this study suggests spinal anesthesia might be a reasonable option to discuss with your anesthesiologist and surgeon, but it doesn't prove it's better for everyone.

What this means for you:
A single study found spinal anesthesia was linked to lower cancer recurrence, but more research is needed to confirm this finding.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 287
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up24.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The effect of anesthesia methods on non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrence post-resection remains uncertain. We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of spinal anesthesia (SA) and general anesthesia (GA) in patients with NMIBC. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial recruited 287 patients with clinical NMIBC at Seoul National University Hospital from 2018 to 2020. The patients underwent transurethral resection of the bladder tumor within 4 weeks of randomization. Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) and a mixture of propofol (1-2 mg/kg) and fentanyl (50-100 μg/kg) were used as induction agents in the SA and GA groups, respectively, with desflurane or sevoflurane used for maintaining anesthesia. The primary and secondary outcome measures were disease recurrence and disease progression, respectively, at 2 years after resection. Cumulative incidence of outcomes was compared between the two groups using time-to-event analyses. RESULTS: 15 patients required alternative anesthesia owing to clinical needs such as SA failure or significant obturator reflex, resulting in a modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population of 272 patients. Time-to-event analysis showed a significantly lower recurrence of NMIBC in the SA group than in the GA group, in both ITT (27.4% vs 39.8%) and modified ITT populations (26.8% vs 39.6%). Disease progression occurred more frequently in the GA than in the SA group (15.2% vs 7.8%), although the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A notable reduction in the 2-year recurrence rate was observed in patients who underwent SA than in those who underwent GA. Thus, SA may be considered the preferred anesthetic approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03597087.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.