This single-center randomized controlled trial compared two biopsy strategies in 380 biopsy-naïve patients who had a single unilateral suspicious lesion on prostate MRI. Patients were randomized to either targeted and perilesional biopsy (TPLBx) or combined targeted and systematic biopsy (CTSBx). The primary outcome was the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (Grade Group ≥2).
For the primary outcome of Grade Group ≥2 cancer detection, TPLBx was noninferior to CTSBx, with both strategies detecting cancer in 58% of patients (risk difference 0.53%, 95% CI: -9.4% to 11%, p < .001 for noninferiority). The detection rate for Grade Group ≥3 cancer was also identical at 30% for both groups. There were no significant differences in overall prostate cancer detection or Grade Group 1 cancer detection rates.
Regarding safety, TPLBx was associated with a significantly lower overall complication rate (62% vs 74%, p = .023). Specifically, TPLBx resulted in lower rates of rectal bleeding (34% vs 48%, p = .003), hematuria (39% vs 56%, p < .001), and rectal pain (25% vs 34%, p = .018). The study did not report on serious adverse events, discontinuations, or follow-up duration.
A key limitation is that this was a single-center study, and the results are specific to biopsy-naïve patients with a single unilateral suspicious MRI lesion. The noninferiority margin was set at -15%. The study did not report absolute numbers of events, only percentages. For this specific patient population, TPLBx achieved noninferior diagnostic efficacy with better safety than the standard combined biopsy approach.
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: The combined targeted and systematic biopsy (CTSBx) was the standard scheme for patients with visible suspicious lesions on MRI in recent years. 2024 European Association of Urology guideline recommended targeted and perilesional biopsy (TPLBx) for the diagnosis of patients with MRI-visible suspicious lesions. This randomized controlled trial aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of TPLBx and CTSBx schemes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center noninferiority randomized controlled trial consecutively enrolled 380 biopsy-naïve patients (CTSBx: n = 190, TPLBx: n = 190) with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on prostate MRI from June 2024 to November 2024. The noninferiority margin was -15%. All biopsies were undertaken transrectally through the cognitive fusion technique. The primary outcome was Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2 cancer (GG ≥ 2-PCa) detection rate.
RESULTS: The GG ≥ 2-PCa (58% vs 58%, risk difference [RD]: 0.53% [95% CI: -9.4% to 11%]) and GG ≥ 3-PCa (30% vs 30%, RD: 0.53% [95% CI: -8.7% to 9.7%]) detection rates of TPLBx were noninferior to that of CTSBx ( < .001). There was no significant difference in PCa and GG1-PCa detection rates between the 2 groups ( > .050). The complication rate of TPLBx was significantly lower than that of CTSBx group (Clavien-Dindo scale ≥ 1: 62% vs 74%, = .023), especially for bleeding-related complications (rectal bleeding: 34% vs 48%, = .003; hematuria, 39% vs 56%, < .001) and rectal pain (25% vs 34%, = .018). TPLBx could significantly shorten the procedure time and saved the pathological cost ( < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on prostate MRI, TPLBx achieved the noninferior diagnostic efficacy of clinically significant PCa and better safety than the CTSBx scheme.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06482658.