Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Tertiary lymphoid structures represent a promising but context-dependent biomarker and potential therapeutic intermediate in breast cancer

Tertiary lymphoid structures represent a promising but context-dependent biomarker and potential…
Photo by Shawn Day / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that TLS status is a promising but context-dependent biomarker requiring standardized classification.

This narrative review examines the potential clinical relevance of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) in patients with breast cancer. The scope of the discussion centers on the interpretation of TLS status as a biomarker and its potential as a therapeutic intermediate.

The authors highlight that the biological and clinical significance of TLS in breast cancer is highly heterogeneous. Consequently, this heterogeneity means that the condition cannot be adequately captured by a simple TLS-positive versus TLS-negative classification.

The review identifies that standardized classification and a deeper mechanistic understanding are required to properly interpret TLS status. These gaps suggest that current methods for categorizing TLS presence may be insufficient for precise clinical application.

In terms of practice relevance, TLS status is described as a promising but context-dependent biomarker. Clinicians should recognize that its utility depends on specific contexts not fully detailed in this narrative synthesis.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are ectopic lymphoid aggregates that arise in non-lymphoid tissues under chronic inflammatory conditions and during tumor development. Although TLS have often been associated with a favorable prognosis and enhanced therapeutic responsiveness, their biological and clinical significance in breast cancer is highly heterogeneous and cannot be adequately captured by a simple TLS-positive versus TLS-negative classification. In this review, we summarize the structural organization and developmental stages of TLS, with an emphasis on the functional relevance of maturation, including germinal center formation. We further discuss current concepts regarding the mechanisms driving TLS initiation and maturation, including stromal activation, chemokine-guided immune cell recruitment, and high endothelial venule-mediated lymphocyte trafficking. In addition, we examine the major dimensions of TLS heterogeneity in breast cancer, including differences in maturity, spatial location, molecular subtype, and immune cellular composition, and discuss how these variables shape antitumor, immunoregulatory, and context-dependent TLS functions. We also evaluate the current approaches for TLS identification and classification, highlighting the strengths and limitations of histopathology, immunophenotyping, multiplex imaging, and transcriptomic inference. Finally, we discuss the prognostic and predictive relevance of TLS in breast cancer, the barriers limiting its clinical translation, and key priorities for future research. Overall, TLS status represents a promising but context-dependent biomarker and potential therapeutic intermediate whose interpretation requires standardized classification and a deeper mechanistic understanding.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.