Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Krabbe disease is associated with 84% overall survivalStem Cell Transplant Shows Favorable Survival for Krabbe Disease

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that while HSCT shows favorable survival in Krabbe disease, neurological stability remains poorly defined.

This meta-analysis evaluated the outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with genetically or enzymatically confirmed Krabbe disease across 15 studies involving 141 patients. The analysis found a favorable overall survival (OS) of 84% (95% CI, 75% to 93%) and a 5-year OS of 80% (95% CI, 69% to 92%). Transplant-related mortality was reported at 7% (95% CI, 1% to 13%).

Secondary outcomes included acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at 53% and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) at 25%. Neurological stability was reported in 77% of cases (15 patients), while MRI stability was observed in 49% of cases (32 patients). These secondary outcomes, along with GVHD rates, exhibited substantial heterogeneity and wide confidence intervals.

The authors noted significant limitations, including the fact that neurological and MRI outcomes were reported in only a few studies and a small number of patients. Meta-regression indicated inverse associations of OS with sample size and NOS score (P < 0.001). While HSCT is associated with favorable survival and relatively low transplant-related mortality, these results should not be interpreted as evidence of preserved neurological function due to the heterogeneous and imprecisely estimated data for those specific outcomes.

Researchers analyzed data from 141 patients with confirmed Krabbe disease to see how hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) affects survival. The study found an overall survival rate of 84 percent among those who received the transplant. Additionally, about 80 percent of these patients survived for at least five years.

The review also looked at safety and complications. While some patients experienced graft-versus-host disease, the rate of death directly related to the transplant was low, at 7 percent. These findings suggest that the procedure is associated with better survival outcomes for those with this condition.

It is important to note that while survival rates are more certain, other results are less clear. Data regarding neurological stability and MRI changes were based on a small number of patients and showed wide variations. Because these specific measurements were not consistently reported across all studies, they cannot be used to confirm if the transplant preserves neurological function.

What this means for you:
Stem cell transplants show promising survival rates for Krabbe disease, but data on neurological stability is limited.

Common questions

How does the transplant affect survival for Krabbe disease?

The study found an overall survival rate of 84 percent for patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Specifically, about 80 percent of these patients reached the five-year mark after their procedure.

What are the risks associated with the transplant?

The risk of death directly related to the transplant was reported at 7 percent. Other complications included acute graft-versus-host disease in 53 percent of cases and chronic graft-versus-host disease in 25 percent of cases.

Does the treatment improve neurological function?

The data on whether the transplant preserves neurological function is not clear. Because these results were reported in only a few studies and for a small number of patients, the evidence is currently too inconsistent to draw firm conclusions.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundKrabbe disease is a rare, rapidly progressive leukodystrophy with high early mortality. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the main disease-modifying intervention used in clinical practice and may act through donor-derived myeloid and immune-cell replacement, enzymatic cross-correction, and immunomodulation. However, its benefits and immune-related toxicities remain incompletely quantified.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting HSCT outcomes in genetically or enzymatically confirmed Krabbe disease. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included 5-year OS, transplant-related mortality (TRM), acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD and cGVHD), neurological stability, and MRI stability. For OS, publication bias or small-study effects were assessed using funnel-plot inspection and Egger’s regression test. Exploratory univariable meta-regression examined total study sample size, publication year, and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) score, and robustness was assessed using leave-one-out sensitivity analysis.ResultsFifteen studies involving 141 patients were included. Pooled OS after HSCT was 84% (95% CI, 75%–93%), 5-year OS was 80% (69%–92%), and TRM was 7% (1%–13%). The pooled incidences of aGVHD and cGVHD were 53% (16%–90%) and 25% (0%–53%), respectively. Neurological stability was reported in only four studies including 15 patients (77%; 31%–100%), and MRI stability in four studies including 32 patients (49%; 7%–90%); both estimates showed substantial heterogeneity and wide confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses by disease-onset age, pre-transplant symptom status, and age at HSCT showed no statistically significant OS differences. Egger’s test detected no significant funnel-plot asymmetry (P = 0.569). Leave-one-out estimates ranged from 82% to 86%. Meta-regression showed inverse associations of reported OS with total study sample size and NOS score (both P < 0.001), whereas publication year was not significant (P = 0.118).ConclusionHSCT is associated with favorable survival and relatively low pooled TRM in selected patients with Krabbe disease. However, survival should not be interpreted as preservation of neurological function, because neurological, MRI, and GVHD outcomes were reported in few studies and patients and remained heterogeneous and imprecisely estimated. These findings require cautious interpretation but provide clinically useful benchmark data for counseling and comparison with emerging cellular and gene-based therapies.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420261285624.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.