Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Immune checkpoint inhibitor and chemotherapy combination improves pathological response in gastric adenocarcinomaImmune therapy combined with chemotherapy improves gastric cancer outcomes

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that ICI plus chemotherapy significantly improves pCR and MPR in gastric adenocarcinoma compared to chemotherapy alone.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates various immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) based neoadjuvant and perioperative strategies for patients with locally advanced resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. The analysis included 74 trials, consisting of 16 randomized controlled trials and 58 prospective single-arm trials.

The meta-analysis found that ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI+CT) significantly increased pathological complete response (pCR) with a RR of 3.01 (95% CI, 2.19-4.15) and major pathological response (MPR) with a RR of 1.59 (95% CI, 1.36-1.85). Additionally, the combination of ICI plus chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy (ICI+CT+A) showed a higher RR for pCR of 3.43 (95% CI, 1.85-6.37) and an RR of 1.40 (95% CI, 1.12-1.76) for MPR. In perioperative trials, ICI+CT was associated with improved event-free survival (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66-0.83) and overall survival (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93).

Authors noted several limitations, including limited comparative evidence for ICI+CRT, ICI+CT+H, and ICI+ICI. Survival evidence for the ICI+CT+A regimen is also limited to a single phase II RCT. While ICI+CT has the most mature evidence base for improving pathological response and survival, the authors caution that improved pathological response has not consistently translated into survival benefit across all contexts.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis extends the clinical understanding of neoadjuvant and perioperative strategies for gastric adenocarcinoma. It specifically builds upon the finding that immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy improve pathological complete response in triple-negative breast cancer, by providing evidence for similar improvements in pCR and MPR in gastric adenocarcinoma. The study confirms that ICI+CT has the most mature evidence base for improving outcomes in this specific gastric cancer population.

When facing advanced stomach or esophageal junction cancer, the goal of treatment is to shrink the tumor and improve long-term survival. A large review of 74 trials looked at how adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (medicines that help the immune system attack cancer) to standard chemotherapy changes these outcomes.

The data shows that combining these immune therapies with chemotherapy leads to a much higher rate of pathological complete response, which means the cancer is no longer visible in tissue samples. Patients also saw better overall survival and event-free survival when this combination was used in perioperative settings. Some specific combinations, like adding anti-angiogenic therapy, also showed increased response rates.

While the results are promising, the evidence is not equal for every treatment. While the combination of immune inhibitors and chemotherapy has the most established evidence, other combinations like those involving radiation or specific hormone therapies have much less data. Because some of these newer combinations have been tested in only a few trials, doctors still need more information to know exactly how they perform compared to standard care.

What this means for you:
Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy improves response rates and survival in advanced stomach cancer.

Common questions

How does adding immune therapy to chemotherapy help stomach cancer?

Adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy significantly increases the rate of pathological complete response and major pathological response. This means the treatment is more effective at clearing cancer from the tissue. For patients in perioperative trials, this combination also showed improved overall survival and event-free survival.

Is this treatment safe for all types of stomach cancer?

The study focused on patients with locally advanced resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. While the combination of immune inhibitors and chemotherapy has the most mature evidence base, other combinations like those involving radiation or hormone therapy have much less data available.

What are the limitations of these findings?

While the results for immune inhibitor and chemotherapy combinations are strong, there is limited evidence for other strategies like adding radiation or hormone therapy. Additionally, survival data for some specific combinations, such as those including anti-angiogenic therapy, is currently limited to only one phase II trial.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based neoadjuvant/perioperative strategies are expanding for locally advanced resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma, but the evidence base differs substantially across strategies, and improved pathological response has not consistently translated into survival benefit. We aimed to synthesize strategy-specific comparative and prospective single-arm evidence.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and major oncology conference proceedings were searched from inception to August 3, 2026. RCTs and prospective single-arm trials evaluating ICI-containing treatment initiated before surgery were included. Five strategies were evaluated: ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI+CT), ICI plus chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy (ICI+CT+A), ICI plus chemoradiotherapy (ICI+CRT), ICI plus chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy (ICI+CT+H), and dual-ICI therapy (ICI+ICI). Random-effects comparative meta-analyses were conducted separately by strategy, while single-arm analyses provided descriptive absolute estimates.ResultsA total of 74 trials, including 16 RCTs and 58 prospective single-arm trials, were included. In randomized comparisons, ICI+CT was associated with improved pCR (RR, 3.01; 95% CI, 2.19-4.15) and MPR (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.36-1.85) and, in perioperative trials, OS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93) and EFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66-0.83) compared with chemotherapy. ICI+CT+A was associated with improved pCR (RR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.85-6.37) and MPR (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.12-1.76), but survival evidence was limited to one phase II RCT reporting OS. Comparative evidence for ICI+CRT was limited to one small RCT. Evidence for ICI+CT+H and ICI+ICI was derived mainly from small biomarker-selected noncomparative studies.ConclusionsEvidence differed substantially across the five strategies. ICI+CT was associated with improved pCR and MPR and, in perioperative RCTs, OS and EFS; it had the largest and most mature randomized evidence base. ICI+CT+A was associated with improved pCR and MPR, whereas comparative evidence for ICI+CRT, ICI+CT+H, and ICI+ICI remained limited. Further comparative trials are required, particularly for safety and long-term survival.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251271789, identifier CRD420251271789.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.