Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Nasal saline irrigation significantly reduces nasal symptoms and rescue antihistamine use in pediatric allergic rhinitisNasal Saline Irrigation Reduces Symptoms for Children with Allergies

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider nasal saline irrigation as a safe, effective intervention to reduce symptoms and antihistamine use in pediatric patients.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of nasal saline irrigation (isotonic 0.9% or hypertonic >0.9%) compared to standard pharmacological care or no intervention in children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger with physician-confirmed allergic rhinitis. The analysis included 462 participants to assess nasal symptom scores, rescue antihistamine use, and disease control scores.

The synthesis revealed a large and statistically significant reduction in nasal symptom scores (SMD -1.29; 95% CI -1.98 to -0.60). Additionally, there was a significant decrease in rescue antihistamine use (SMD -1.38; 95% CI -2.50 to -0.26). While there was a trend toward improved disease control (SMD 0.53), this result did not reach statistical significance (95% CI -0.03 to 1.08).

Safety data indicated that adverse events were minor, such as nasal irritation, and were infrequent. However, the authors note that the evidence for nasal symptom scores is of low certainty, while the evidence for rescue antihistamine use and disease control is of very low certainty due to a high risk-of-bias in the source studies. Clinically, nasal saline irrigation is considered an effective and safe intervention for this population, providing meaningful symptom relief and a medication-sparing effect.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in managing pediatric allergic rhinitis by providing evidence for a non-pharmacological intervention. While other evidence highlights the role of eosinophils as dual-role cells and the potential of calcium homeostasis as a regulatory node in allergic rhinitis inflammation, this study specifically quantifies the impact of nasal saline irrigation on symptoms and medication use in children. It provides a measurable reduction in rescue antihistamine use (SMD -1.38) for this specific population.

A review of research involving 462 children and adolescents with confirmed allergic rhinitis looked at the effects of nasal saline irrigation. The study compared using saline rinses to standard medical care or no treatment at all. The results showed a large and significant reduction in nasal symptom scores for the children using saline.

In addition to better symptoms, the children who used saline rinses needed to use rescue antihistamines much less often. While there was a trend toward better overall disease control, this specific result was not statistically significant. The study noted that the evidence for these findings was of low to very low certainty, partly due to a high risk of bias in the original studies.

Safety was a key finding as well. The only reported side effects were minor, such as infrequent nasal irritation. No serious events were reported. Because the evidence is limited and the study's certainty is low, these results should be viewed as a starting point for discussion with a healthcare provider rather than a definitive rule.

What this means for you:
Nasal saline irrigation may reduce symptoms and antihistamine use in children with allergies, though evidence is limited.

Common questions

Is nasal saline irrigation safe for children with allergies?

Yes, the study found that nasal saline irrigation is a safe intervention for children and adolescents. The only reported side effects were minor and infrequent, such as nasal irritation. No serious adverse events were reported during the study period.

How does saline irrigation affect allergy symptoms?

The study showed a large and statistically significant reduction in nasal symptom scores for children using saline. Additionally, there was a significant decrease in the amount of rescue antihistamines these children needed to use.

How certain are these results for children's allergies?

The evidence for these findings is limited. The study noted low to very low certainty for the results regarding symptom scores, antihistamine use, and disease control. Because of this, you should talk to a doctor about the best treatment plan.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 462
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up216.0 mo
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: To critically evaluate and synthesize evidence from controlled trials regarding the efficacy and safety of nasal saline irrigation (NSI), utilizing both isotonic and hypertonic solutions, for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) exclusively in children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed for studies published up to May 2025. Eligibility criteria included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials comparing NSI (isotonic 0.9% or hypertonic >0.9%) against standard pharmacological care or no intervention in pediatric populations with physician-confirmed AR. Primary outcomes assessed were changes in nasal symptom scores, rescue antihistamine use, and disease control scores, with the certainty of evidence evaluated using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Seven studies involving a total of 462 participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis demonstrated that NSI resulted in a large and statistically significant reduction in nasal symptom scores compared with controls (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] -1.29; 95% CI -1.98 to -0.60), supported by low-certainty evidence. Furthermore, NSI was associated with a significant decrease in rescue antihistamine use (SMD -1.38; 95% CI -2.50 to -0.26; very low certainty). Although a trend toward improved disease control was observed (SMD 0.53), it did not reach statistical significance (95% CI -0.03 to 1.08), and the evidence was graded as very low certainty. Adverse events were minor (e.g., nasal irritation) and infrequent, with no serious safety concerns reported. CONCLUSION: Nasal saline irrigation is an effective and safe intervention for children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis, offering clinically meaningful improvements in nasal symptoms and a significant medication-sparing effect. NSI can reasonably be considered as an adjunctive therapy alongside standard pharmacological care, with the choice of saline tonicity potentially tailored to the predominant symptom phenotype, although the predominance of high risk-of-bias evidence warrants confirmation in more rigorous trials.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.