Systematic review of anti-IL-5 biologics in hypereosinophilic syndrome kidney disease reports low certainty evidence.
This publication is a systematic review with narrative synthesis examining the utility of anti-IL-5 and IL-5Rα biologics in patients with histologically confirmed hypereosinophilic syndrome-related kidney disease. The review analyzed 42 cases to characterize pathology findings and therapeutic evidence across the included literature.
Acute eosinophilic interstitial nephritis predominated at 54.8% (23/42), followed by thrombotic microangiopathy at 19.0% (8/42) and chronic interstitial fibrosis at 11.9% (5/42). Glomerular lesions occurred in 14.3% (6/42) of cases. IgG4-RKD-like features were observed in 21.4% (9 cases). Median IgG4+/IgG+ ratios were 21% (IQR 14-30%), remaining below 40%. Treatment response to anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα biologics showed 100% improvement (14/14) in all reported instances.
The authors note significant limitations, including uncontrolled study designs, high heterogeneity, and selection bias from biopsy requirements. Certainty ratings were low for descriptive pathology findings and very low for IgG4/IgG ratio observations and treatment efficacy conclusions. Publication bias and risk of bias further limit interpretation.
The 40% IgG4/IgG ratio remains unvalidated and should not be used diagnostically. International prospective registries and individual patient data meta-analyses are needed to establish evidence-based management. Clinicians should interpret these findings with caution given the very low certainty regarding treatment efficacy.