Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

HBV-positive status linked to higher surgical conversion in unresectable HCC receiving triple therapyHBV-positive linked to better outcomes in liver cancer triple therapy

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note observational association between HBV-positive status and improved outcomes with TACE/lenvatinib/PD-1 therapy in unresectable HCC.

In a single-center, retrospective cohort study, 190 patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor therapy. The analysis compared HBV-positive and HBV-negative patients after propensity score matching (30 matched pairs). The primary outcome was surgical conversion.

HBV-positive patients achieved significantly higher surgical conversion rates than HBV-negative patients before PSM (25.6% vs. 12.3%, P=0.041) and after PSM (20% vs. 10%, P=0.021). Overall survival was prolonged in HBV-positive patients (median not reached) versus HBV-negative patients (median 20.0 months; 95% CI, 17.1–22.9; P=0.014). Progression-free survival was 28.4 months in HBV-positive patients versus 17.3 months in HBV-negative patients (95% CI, 25.6–31.2 and 14.8–19.9, respectively; P=0.030). Tumor response was higher in HBV-positive patients: ORR 36.7% vs. 20% (P=0.043) and DCR 83.3% vs. 60% (P=0.045). A landmark analysis for PFS showed the advantage was no longer statistically significant (P=0.118). Grade 3–4 AEs were comparable between groups, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Limitations include the retrospective single-center design, small sample size after PSM, and potential selection bias. The study cannot establish causation, and biological mechanisms remain unclarified. Practice relevance is limited to hypothesis generation; prospective validation is needed before changing management.

Researchers studied 190 patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) who received a triple combination: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), lenvatinib, and a PD-1 inhibitor. They compared outcomes between HBV-positive and HBV-negative patients using a statistical method to balance the groups (propensity score matching), leaving 30 matched pairs for key analyses.

HBV-positive patients had higher rates of surgical conversion (20% vs. 10% after matching), better tumor responses, and longer survival. Median overall survival was not reached in the HBV-positive group versus 20.0 months in the HBV-negative group. Progression-free survival was 28.4 months versus 17.3 months. However, a landmark analysis for progression-free survival was not statistically significant, suggesting the timing of benefit may vary.

Safety was similar: Grade 3–4 adverse events were comparable, and no treatment-related deaths were reported. Discontinuation rates were not provided.

This was a small, single-center, retrospective study, so the results show an association rather than proof of cause. The findings need confirmation in larger, prospective trials before changing care.

What this means for you:
HBV-positive status was linked to higher conversion and survival with TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors, but this small, retrospective study does not prove cause.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundThe combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors has shown promising efficacy in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on the outcomes of this therapy remains unclear. This study aims to assess the association between HBV infection status and clinical outcomes in patients with initially unresectable HCC undergoing triple therapy.MethodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study included 190 consecutive uHCC patients treated with triple therapy between February 2022 and February 2025. Patients were stratified into HBV-positive (n = 133) and HBV-negative (n = 57) groups based on HBsAg status. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1, caliper 0.02) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint was surgical conversion. Secondary endpoints included tumor response (mRECIST), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Landmark analyses, subgroup analyses and multivariate Cox regression were used to evaluate clinical outcomes and independent prognostic factors.ResultsCompared to HBV-negative patients, HBV-positive patients achieved significantly higher surgical conversion rates both before PSM (25.6% vs. 12.3%, P = 0.041) and after PSM (20% vs. 10%, P = 0.021). After PSM, 30 matched pairs were included. Median OS was not reached in the HBV-positive patients and was 20.0 months in the HBV-negative patients (95% CI, 17.1–22.9; P = 0.014). Median PFS was 28.4 months (95% CI, 25.6–31.2) versus 17.3 months (95% CI, 14.8–19.9; P = 0.030). Tumor response was superior in the HBV-positive group, with higher ORR (36.7% vs. 20%, P = 0.043) and DCR (83.3% vs. 60%, P = 0.045). HBV-positive patients exhibited significantly prolonged OS (P = 0.014) and PFS (P = 0.030). Landmark analysis showed that the PFS advantage in HBV-positive patients no longer statistically significant (P = 0.118). Tumor diameter and HBV infection status were independent predictor of OS and PFS. Grade 3–4 AEs were comparable between groups, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.ConclusionsHBV-positive status was associated with higher conversion rates and more favorable survival outcomes in unresectable HCC treated with TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors. Prospective validation is needed to confirm these findings and clarify their biological basis.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.