This cohort study assessed a multimodal fusion model integrating deep learning features from longitudinal DCE-MRI, peripheral blood inflammatory (PBI) indices, and baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in 262 breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). The primary outcome was pathological complete response (pCR) to NAT. The study compared this combined approach against single-modality models, including Pre-NAT DL, Post-2nd-NAT DL, immune-inflammation, and clinical models.
The combined model demonstrated superior predictive performance with an AUC of 0.90 and 95% specificity. In comparisons, the Post-2nd-NAT DL model achieved an AUC of 0.85, outperforming the Pre-NAT DL model which had an AUC of 0.75. The immune-inflammation model showed independent predictive capability with an AUC of 0.73. The combined model showed significantly better performance than single-modality models.
Safety, adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported. The study setting and follow-up duration were not reported. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. Limitations regarding causality and certainty were not reported. This observational evidence supports the potential of the tool to aid personalized treatment planning in breast cancer patients undergoing NAT, though clinical application should await further validation.
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveThis study developed and validated a multimodal fusion model to enable the early and accurate prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in breast cancer. The model integrates deep learning (DL) features derived from longitudinal dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) acquired early during treatment, peripheral blood inflammatory (PBI) indices, and baseline levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).MethodsA total of 262 breast cancer patients receiving NAT were retrospectively enrolled and divided into a training cohort (n=183) and a validation cohort (n=79) based on the time of surgery. Deep learning models (Pre-NAT DL and Post-2nd-NAT DL) were constructed using features extracted from pre-treatment (baseline) and post-second-cycle DCE-MRI images, respectively. An immune-inflammation model was built using baseline TILs and dynamically changing PBI indices. A clinical model was developed based on baseline clinicopathological characteristics. Finally, a combined model was constructed by integrating features from all the aforementioned modalities. The models were developed using various machine learning algorithms, and their predictive performance was assessed and compared.ResultsIn the validation cohort, the combined model achieved superior predictive performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 and specificity of 95%. Its performance was significantly better than that of any single-modality model. The Post-2nd-NAT DL model (AUC = 0.85) outperformed the Pre-NAT DL model (AUC = 0.75), confirming the critical predictive value of deep learning features from early-treatment DCE-MRI. The immune-inflammation model also exhibited independent predictive capability (AUC = 0.73).ConclusionThe combined model integrating deep learning features from early longitudinal DCE-MRI, dynamic systemic inflammatory indicators, and baseline TILs significantly enhances the early prediction of pCR to NAT in breast cancer. This multimodal fusion strategy offers a potential tool to aid personalized treatment planning in breast cancer patients undergoing NAT.