Meta-analysis compares infection rates of teclistamab in clinical trials and real-world evidence
This meta-analysis synthesized data from 714 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma to compare infection rates associated with teclistamab between clinical trials and real-world evidence (RWE). The study focused on the incidence of any-grade and grade 3 or greater infections.
The pooled incidence of any-grade infections was 56.5% (95% CI: 43.1% to 69.9%), while the pooled incidence of grade 3 or greater infections was 27.6% (95% CI: 21.0% to 34.3%). A subgroup analysis revealed higher infection rates in clinical trials compared to RWE. Specifically, any-grade infections were reported at 76.4% in clinical trials versus 45.4% in RWE (p < 0.01). Similarly, grade 3 or greater infections were reported at 44.8% in clinical trials versus 22.8% in RWE (p < 0.01).
While the meta-analysis provides a comparison of infection frequencies, the follow-up duration was not reported. The findings highlight a discrepancy in reported infection rates between controlled trial settings and real-world clinical practice, suggesting that clinicians should monitor for infections closely when using teclistamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.