Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis shows dual ICI therapy improves survival in advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Meta-analysis shows dual ICI therapy improves survival in advanced metastatic non-small cell lung…
Photo by Odile / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider dual ICI therapy for advanced NSCLC; survival benefit observed but safety data not reported.

This meta-analysis examines the efficacy of dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with CTLA-4 inhibitors, compared to control treatments. The analysis included data from 6,369 patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival, with progression-free survival as a secondary outcome. Follow-up duration was not reported for the pooled results.

The results indicated significantly better overall survival in the dual treatment group, with a hazard ratio of 0.84 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.76 to 0.92. The p-value for this finding was 0.003. Progression-free survival also showed significant benefit, with a hazard ratio of 0.78 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.68 to 0.89. The p-value for progression-free survival was 0.002.

The authors state that the efficacy difference varies across subgroups. Safety data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability, were not reported in this source. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. The practice relevance is that dual therapy improves prognosis in this population, though clinicians should consider the lack of reported safety information when interpreting these findings.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Dual immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy (PD-1/PD-L1+CTLA-4 inhibitors) has emerged as a promising strategy, but its efficacy and optimal patient selection remain uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dual ICI therapy in advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We systematically searched Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed from inception to August 2025 for RCTs comparing dual ICI therapy (PD-1/PD-L1+CTLA-4 inhibitors) versus control treatments in advanced/metastatic NSCLC. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Ten RCTs comprising 6,369 patients were included. The OS (HR = 0.84, 95%CI 0.76-0.92, p=0.003) and PFS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI 0.68-0.89, p=0.002) of patients who received dual ICI treatment were significantly better than those in the control group. Subgroup analyses of the OS revealed significant benefits, including: squamous, non-squamous, PD-1 inhibitor, PD-L1 inhibitor, bone metastases, without bone metastases, male, age Dual ICI therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors improves prognosis in advanced/metastatic NSCLC, with efficacy difference across subgroups. TMB may serve as a complementary predictive biomarker for dual immunotherapy.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.