Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis on cold air bronchial challenge test for asthma diagnosisCold air test may cut asthma misdiagnosis in half

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider the cold air challenge test's high specificity but note high heterogeneity limits diagnostic certainty.

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 39 studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of the cold air bronchial challenge test (CACh) in patients with asthma and healthy controls. The authors synthesized data on the test's sensitivity and specificity, as well as its effect on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV).

The meta-analysis found a sensitivity of 0.808 and a specificity of 0.959 for CACh in diagnosing asthma. The weighted mean difference in percentage FEV decrease between asthma patients and healthy controls was -17.58. The overall effect of CACh on FEV in patients with asthma, after trim-and-fill adjustment, was -8.18 (p<0.001).

The authors noted high heterogeneity (I=99), which was mainly explained by differences in reference tests used to diagnose asthma. No safety data were reported.

The review suggests possible clinical implications of CACh in asthma diagnosis, but the high heterogeneity limits the certainty of the findings. Practice relevance is restrained pending further research.

Imagine you feel chest tightness after a run on a cold day. Your doctor wants to confirm asthma, but standard tests can be unclear. A simple cold air test might help sort this out.

Asthma is common and tricky to diagnose. Symptoms can look like other conditions. Some people get labeled with asthma when they do not have it. Others miss the diagnosis and struggle without the right treatment. This can lead to delays, unnecessary medicines, or fear of exercise.

Doctors often use breathing tests and symptom checks to diagnose asthma. But these tools are not perfect. Exercise induced symptoms can be hard to trigger in a clinic. This is where a cold air bronchial challenge test, called CACh, comes in. You breathe cold, dry air and doctors measure changes in your breathing.

But here is the twist. Cold air can narrow the airways in people with asthma more than in people without asthma. Think of the airways like a straw. In asthma, the straw squeezes more easily when it gets cold and dry. A CACh tries to catch that squeeze and turn it into a clear number.

A new systematic review and meta-analysis looked at how well this test works. Researchers screened medical databases for studies using CACh to diagnose asthma or exercise induced bronchoconstriction. They included 39 studies after removing duplicates. They used standard methods to combine results and check for bias.

The team focused on a key number. A drop of 10 percent or more in FEV1, a common breathing measure, after the cold air test. They found that the test correctly identifies asthma in about 81 out of 100 people who truly have it. It correctly rules out asthma in about 96 out of 100 people who do not have it. That means fewer false alarms and fewer missed cases.

They also found a clear difference between groups. On average, people with asthma had a 17.6 percent bigger drop in FEV1 after the cold air test than healthy people. Even after adjusting for possible publication bias, the difference remained large and statistically significant. This suggests the test can reliably separate asthma from non asthma breathing issues.

This does not mean the test is available in every clinic today.

The researchers noted high variability across studies. Much of this came from differences in how asthma was confirmed in each study. Some used strict criteria, others were more flexible. When they adjusted for this, the results became more consistent. The overall effect still pointed to a meaningful drop in breathing for people with asthma.

Experts in the field see promise here. A cold air test is simple and may be easier to perform than some other challenge tests. It could be especially useful for people whose symptoms show up during cold weather or exercise. It might also help in places where other tests are hard to access.

What does this mean for you. If you have symptoms that suggest asthma, especially with exercise or cold air, ask your doctor about challenge testing. A CACh is not yet a standard tool everywhere, but it is being studied. Your doctor can help decide if it fits your situation and what other tests might be useful.

The review has limits. The studies varied in design and population. Many were small. The test is not a stand alone diagnosis. It should be used with a full clinical evaluation. Results can also be influenced by how the test is done and how cold the air is.

What happens next. More research is needed to confirm these findings and to standardize the test. Future trials may compare CACh to other asthma tests in real world clinics. If results hold up, guidelines could include CACh as an option. That would give doctors and patients another tool to reach the right diagnosis faster.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, making uniform diagnosis challenging, resulting in both under- and overdiagnosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise the data on diagnostic accuracy of a cold air bronchial challenge test (CACh) in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and asthma. METHODS: Databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science core collection, Cochrane Library and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature EBSCO) were systematically screened for articles evaluating the use of CACh as a diagnostic tool in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and asthma. A random-effects model was used to calculate the effect on the reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV) by CACh in healthy controls compared to patients with asthma. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-Comparative. This study is registered with PROSPERO (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ identifier number CRD42021290350). RESULTS: After screening and removal of duplicates, 39 studies were included. Aggregate sensitivity and specificity of a FEV decrease ≥10% after CACh were 0.808 and 0.959, respectively. The weighted mean difference in percentage FEV decrease after CACh for patients with asthma compared to healthy controls was -17.58. High heterogeneity (I=99) was mainly explained by differences in reference tests to diagnose asthma. Application of the trim-and-fill method to account for publication bias imputed eight studies, resulting in a notable reduction in heterogeneity. The overall effect (a significant decrease in FEV in patients with asthma) remained statistically significant (-8.18, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows the high sensitivity and specificity and possible clinical implications of a CACh in the diagnosis of asthma. Further research is needed to confirm this.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.