Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation cuts neuropathic pain intensity with large effect in meta-analysis

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation cuts neuropathic pain intensity with large effect in…
Photo by Julia Koblitz / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider rTMS for neuropathic pain based on significant pain reduction, but note high heterogeneity and limited long-term data.

This is a meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for peripheral neuropathic pain. The analysis pooled data from 435 patients and compared rTMS to sham stimulation.

The authors found that rTMS significantly improved pain intensity, with a standardized mean difference of -1.11 (95% CI: -1.72 to -0.49; p = 0.0004). A 30% reduction in pain was achieved with a relative risk of 3.31 (95% CI: 0.98 to 11.20; p = 0.05). Sleep quality and Patient Global Impression of Change were not statistically significant.

The authors noted high heterogeneity and limited long-term data as key limitations. Safety analysis showed no significant increase in adverse events such as headache (RR = 1.32, p = 0.1), dizziness, pain at the stimulation site, sleep disturbances, or cognitive complaints.

The findings support the clinical utility of rTMS for neuropathic pain, but the evidence is limited by heterogeneity and lack of long-term follow-up. Practice relevance is restrained pending more robust data.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 435
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) results from damage to peripheral nerves, leading to intractable or exaggerated pain. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive therapeutic method that modulates cortical neuronal activity and can promote endogenous opioid release, with a potential analgesic effect. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of rTMS use in PNP patients. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating rTMS in PNP. The primary outcome was pain intensity. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4.1. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and a random-effects model was used to compute pooled estimates, expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD), mean differences (MD), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Nine studies with 435 patients were included. rTMS significantly improved pain intensity (SMD = -1.11, 95% CI: [-1.72, -0.49]; p = 0.0004) and achieved a 30% reduction in pain (RR = 3.31, 95% CI: [0.98, 11.20]; p = 0.05). Improvements in sleep quality (SMD = -1.02, p = 0.26) and Patient Global Impression of Change were not statistically significant (RR = 1.70, p = 0.13). Safety analysis showed no significant increase in adverse events such as headache (RR = 1.32, p = 0.1), dizziness, pain at the stimulation site, sleep disturbances, or cognitive complaints. CONCLUSION: rTMS significantly reduces pain in PNP patients without major safety concerns. While findings support its clinical utility, high heterogeneity and limited long-term data suggest further standardized trials are warranted. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42024628350.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.