Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Auditory distraction and VR reduce pain during burn dressing changes in adults receiving morphine

Auditory distraction and VR reduce pain during burn dressing changes in adults receiving morphine
Photo by Fulvio Ciccolo / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider auditory distraction or VR as adjuncts for procedural pain in burn patients receiving morphine, but recognize evidence is from a small, single-center trial.

A single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled 60 adult patients undergoing burn dressing changes, all of whom received intravenous morphine (0.05 mg/kg). The study compared auditory distraction (listening to music) and virtual reality (viewing nature images via headset) during dressing changes against a control group receiving standard care with morphine only. The primary outcome was pain severity during the procedure.

For pain severity, statistically significant differences were observed among the VR, auditory distraction, and control groups (p < .05), with both interventions leading to greater pain reduction than control. For secondary outcomes, oxygen saturation and respiratory rates also differed significantly across groups (p < .05), with both interventions described as equally effective and superior to standard care. The study did not report absolute numbers, effect sizes, or confidence intervals for these outcomes.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the small sample size (approximately 20 patients per group) and the lack of reported absolute effect magnitudes, confidence intervals, or detailed safety monitoring. All patients received morphine, so the observed effects represent adjunctive benefit rather than standalone treatment.

In practice, this evidence suggests nonpharmacological interventions like auditory distraction or VR may serve as effective adjuncts alongside pharmacological treatments for procedural pain management in burn care. However, clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the small study size and incomplete reporting of outcome data.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 20
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effect of auditory distraction and virtual reality (VR) on pain severity and physiological indicators during burn dressing changes among adult patients. DESIGN: A single-center, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to the auditory distraction (n = 20), VR (n = 20), and control (n = 20) groups. All patients in the three groups received intravenous morphine at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg body weight, 15 minutes prior to the dressing change. The auditory distraction group listened to music during the dressing, while the VR group used a headset to view nature images throughout the dressing procedure. Data collection tools were the numeric pain scale, a checklist form of the physiological Indicators, and a pulse oximetry device. RESULT: Statistically significant differences in pain severity were observed among the VR, auditory distraction, and control groups during dressing changes (p < .05). Despite all patients receiving intravenous morphine (0.05 mg/kg), both interventions led to greater pain reduction. Oxygen saturation and respiratory rates also differed significantly across groups (p < .05), with posthoc analysis confirming that both interventions were equally effective and superior to standard care. CONCLUSIONS: This study's findings demonstrated that auditory distraction was as effective as VR techniques in reducing fluctuations in physiological indicators and pain severity during dressing changes in adult patients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nonpharmacological interventions can serve as effective adjuncts alongside pharmacological treatments in pain management nursing.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.