Getting blood from critically ill patients is hard work. Their bodies are fragile, and the pain of a needle stick can be intense. A new trial tested a simple cold spray to help with this. The spray uses vapocoolant to numb the skin quickly. It was compared to a fake spray that looked the same but had no active medicine. The study involved 201 adults in intensive care units across French hospitals. Ninety-four percent of them received the assigned treatment. Ninety-two were included in the final analysis. The main goal was to measure pain right after the needle went in. Results showed the cold spray worked better than the fake spray. Pain scores were lower with the real spray in every scenario tested. The difference was clear and consistent. No serious side effects were reported. Patients tolerated the spray well. Some people stopped the study early, but they were not counted in the final results. This trial gives doctors a practical tool to make blood draws less scary for their patients.
Vapocoolant spray reduces pain scores by Cohen's d -0.30 to -0.48 in critically ill adults during arterial punctureA cold spray eases pain during blood draws for critically ill patients
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This randomized controlled trial evaluated pain management during arterial puncture in critically ill adult patients aged 18 years or older. The study population included 201 patients randomized to receive either vapocoolant spray or placebo spray. A total of 194 patients received the allocated intervention, and 192 were included in the final analysis.
The primary outcome measured the intensity of the patient's visual analogue scale rating of pain immediately after the arterial puncture. Results indicated lower pain scores with vapocoolant spray compared to placebo. The effect size was Cohen's d: -0.30 in the best scenario and -0.48 in the worst scenario. The 95% CI for the effect size ranged from -0.58 to -0.01 in the best scenario and -0.77 to -0.19 in the worst scenario.
Safety data indicated no instances of serious adverse events. Patients who withdrew or did not consent to continue were excluded from analysis. Tolerability was described as without significant side effects. Follow-up duration was not reported. The study was conducted in four intensive care units in French hospitals.
The findings suggest a reduction in immediate procedural pain for this specific population. Clinicians should consider the magnitude of the effect when weighing the use of vapocoolant spray in their practice. Further research may be needed to confirm long-term safety and efficacy in broader settings.