Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Percutaneous electrolysis provides superior pain reduction compared to baseline care in lateral epicondylitisPercutaneous electrolysis and dry needling help treat tennis elbow

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider percutaneous electrolysis for rapid pain reduction and dry needling for improving functional scores in lateral epicondylitis.

This network meta-analysis synthesized data from 38 RCTs to evaluate various interventions for lateral epicondylitis, including percutaneous electrolysis (PE), dry needling (DN), platelet-rich plasma, and corticosteroid injections. The analysis focused on pain relief and functional restoration over a short-term follow-up period of 3 months or less.

For pain reduction, percutaneous electrolysis was identified as the most effective intervention with a SUCRA of 98.5% and a mean difference of -6.00 (95% CI: -9.75 to -2.25) compared to baseline care. Regarding functional improvement measured by the DASH score, dry needling demonstrated the highest ranking probability (SUCRA = 79.7%). On the PRTEE scale, dry needling was the only active treatment significantly superior to conservative care (MD = -25.04; 95% CI: -48.29 to -1.79).

The authors noted several limitations, including high underlying network heterogeneity and a lack of statistical significance in DASH-related pairwise comparisons. Additionally, overlapping prediction intervals were observed. Clinical application should consider that percutaneous electrolysis may favor rapid pain mitigation while dry needling may be preferred for restoring localized elbow function. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the data, SUCRA-based rankings should be interpreted with caution.

How this fits prior evidence

This network meta-analysis addresses a gap in comparing various physical interventions for lateral epicondylitis. It complements prior evidence regarding pharmacological options, such as the combination of oral celecoxib and flurbiprofen hydrogel patch which showed improved outcomes over celecoxib alone. While the previous finding focused on systemic and topical medication, this meta-analysis provides data on procedural interventions like percutaneous electrolysis and dry needling.

Living with chronic elbow pain can make daily tasks difficult. A large review of 38 clinical trials looked at different treatments for lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow. The study compared methods like percutaneous electrolysis (PE), dry needling (DN), and corticosteroid injections to see which provided the best results for patients.

The findings suggest that percutaneous electrolysis is the most effective option for reducing pain quickly. Meanwhile, dry needling showed a high probability of improving overall arm function and was the only active treatment shown to be significantly better than standard care on specific functional scales.

While these treatments show promise for short-term relief, the study notes that results can vary because different patients have different needs. Because some data points were not statistically significant across all categories, doctors should choose a treatment based on whether a patient's main goal is immediate pain reduction or regaining movement and strength.

What this means for you:
Percutaneous electrolysis works best for pain relief, while dry needling helps improve arm function in tennis elbow.

Common questions

Which treatment is best for reducing pain from tennis elbow?

Percutaneous electrolysis was found to be the most effective intervention for pain reduction. It showed a significant improvement compared to baseline care, with a mean difference of -6.00 on the pain scale. This makes it a strong option for patients primarily seeking rapid relief from their discomfort.

How does dry needling help with elbow function?

Dry needling showed high ranking probability for improving arm function. Specifically, it was the only active treatment significantly superior to conservative care on the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation scale, showing a mean difference of -25.04. It is a promising option for restoring movement.

How should I choose between these treatments?

The choice depends on your main symptoms. If your primary goal is quick pain relief, percutaneous electrolysis may be preferred. If you are more concerned with regaining the ability to use your arm and hand effectively, dry needling shows a favorable profile for functional improvement. Talk to your doctor to decide which fits your goals.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundLateral epicondylitis (LE) is a prevalent chronic tendinopathy that significantly impairs upper limb function and quality of life. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to evaluate and compare the short-term (≤3 months) efficacy of various micro-invasive and physical interventions for pain relief and functional restoration, providing an evidence-based framework for tailored clinical decision-making.MethodsA comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating physical interventions for LE. Primary outcomes included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE). Data synthesis, consistency testing, and Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) calculations were performed using Stata 18.0. Two-dimensional cluster analysis was employed to concurrently assess the analgesic and functional benefits of the interventions.ResultsAnalysis of 38 RCTs revealed that percutaneous electrolysis (PE) was the most effective intervention for pain reduction (SUCRA = 98.5%), yielding a clinically pronounced effect size against baseline care (MD = −6.00, 95% CI: −9.75 to −2.25) and outperforming most other physical therapies. Dry needling (DN) demonstrated the highest ranking probability in functional improvement (DASH SUCRA = 79.7%; PRTEE SUCRA = 85.2%), and was the sole active treatment significantly superior to conservative care on the PRTEE scale (MD = −25.04, 95% CI: −48.29 to −1.79). In the cluster analysis, PE was localized to the “strong analgesia” quadrant, while DN was situated in the “strong functional recovery” quadrant. Other interventions, such as platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injections, exhibited only moderate effectiveness.ConclusionThe investigated interventions yield distinct therapeutic profiles for LE within an early temporal window. Percutaneous electrolysis shows the highest probability for rapid pain mitigation, whereas dry needling presents a favorable probability profile for restoring localized elbow function. However, given the high underlying network heterogeneity, the lack of statistical significance in DASH-related pairwise comparisons, and overlapping prediction intervals, these SUCRA-based rankings should be interpreted cautiously. We do not recommend formulating definitive long-term clinical recommendations based on these early temporal profiles; instead, clinical decisions should be tailored to the patient's predominant short-term symptoms—balancing immediate pain relief with early targeted functional recovery.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, PROSPERO CRD420251234552.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.