Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

High-volume PENG block with dexamethasone showed no analgesic advantage over conventional volume in primary total hip arthroplasty.

High-volume PENG block with dexamethasone showed no analgesic advantage over conventional volume in …
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that high-volume PENG block offers no analgesic benefit over conventional volume for primary THA.

This randomized, controlled trial evaluated 40 patients receiving primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia, with 37 included in the final analysis. Participants were stratified into a high-volume group (18 patients) and a conventional-volume group (19 patients). The intervention involved a PENG block with 40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine plus 5 mg dexamethasone for the high-volume group, compared to 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine with 5 mg dexamethasone for the conventional-volume group.

The primary outcome measured dynamic pain scores at 6 hours post-surgery. Results showed no significant difference between groups, with the high-volume group reporting a median pain score of 5 (IQR 4-6) versus a median of 4 (IQR 4-5) in the conventional-volume group. Secondary outcomes included lower limb sensory and motor block assessments at 3, 6, and 24 hours, as well as time to first walking and opioid consumption.

Safety data indicated that the high-volume PENG block did not increase the risk of quadriceps weakness. No adverse events, serious adverse events, or discontinuations were reported. Opioid-related complications and length of hospital stay were recorded as secondary outcomes, though specific comparative statistics for these were not detailed in the provided results. The study followed patients for 3, 6, and 24 hours for block assessments, with opioid consumption tracked up to 48 hours.

Limitations include the small sample size and the lack of reported p-values or confidence intervals for the primary outcome. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported. The practice relevance concludes that high-volume PENG block is not superior to conventional-volume PENG block for improving post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Currently, the optimal volume of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for analgesia after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been clarified. In this trial, we investigated whether a high-volume PENG block has a superior analgesic effect than a conventional PENG block for primary THA. METHODS: Forty patients receiving primary THA under spinal anesthesia were enrolled and randomly divided into the high-volume PENG group (40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine) and the conventional-volume PENG group (20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine). Dexamethasone (5 mg) was added to the local anesthetic in both groups. A blinded researcher performed pain scores and lower limb sensory and motor block assessments at 3, 6, and 24 h after surgery. The time of first walking, time of first opioid consumption, total opioid consumption within 48 h, nerve block, opioid-related complications, and length of hospital stay were recorded. The primary outcome was the dynamic pain scores at 6 h post-surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis, among whom 18 were in the high-volume group and 19 in the conventional-volume group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in dynamic pain scores at 6h after surgery [median and interquartile range (p25, p75) 5(4,6) vs 4 (4,5)] and other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The high-volume PENG block is not superior to conventional-volume PENG block in improving post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing primary THA and does not increase the risk of quadriceps weakness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, https://www.chictr.org.cn). Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2300077281.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.