Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis of gestational diabetes prevalence in African populations

Systematic review and meta-analysis of gestational diabetes prevalence in African populations
Photo by Mykenzie Johnson / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider the pooled GDM prevalence of 12.62% in African populations, noting considerable heterogeneity.

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence in African populations. The authors synthesized data from 241 studies across 33 countries in Africa. The primary finding was a pooled GDM prevalence of 12.62% (95% CI: 10.23%–15.21%), based on 44 prevalence studies. The review also examined research output trends, collaboration networks, thematic structures, risk factors, diagnostic practices, management strategies, and pregnancy outcomes.

The authors noted considerable heterogeneity (I² = 98.4%) and a wide 95% prediction interval (1.18%–33.50%). Prevalence estimates ranged widely from 0.7% to 45.9%. Research output was concentrated in a limited number of countries with minimal regional collaboration.

Limitations include the substantial heterogeneity and the wide prediction interval, which reflect contextual variability. The authors acknowledge that prevalence estimates vary considerably across settings. They suggest that strengthened regional collaboration, greater harmonization of screening, and improved health-system integration are essential for effective maternal health policies.

Practice relevance is restrained; the findings highlight the need for contextually appropriate policies but do not establish causation or recommend specific interventions. The review synthesizes existing evidence but does not provide trial-level details on interventions or comparators.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly important contributor to maternal and neonatal morbidity in Africa, yet the evidence base remains fragmented across settings and research domains. This study integrates systematic review and meta-analysis with bibliometric analysis to synthesize epidemiological evidence, characterize research activity, and examine risk factors, diagnostic practices, management strategies, and pregnancy outcomes related to GDM in Africa. Publications reporting on GDM in African populations were retrieved from major scholarly databases. Bibliometric techniques were applied to evaluate publication trends, collaboration networks, and thematic structures. In parallel, 241 studies from 33 countries were systematically reviewed. Study quality was assessed, demonstrating gradual improvement over time (Spearman’s ρ = 0.307). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled GDM prevalence. Research output increased steadily over time but remained concentrated in a limited number of countries, with minimal regional collaboration. Dominant research themes focused on metabolic risk, diagnostic testing, and pregnancy outcomes, while health-systems and implementation research were comparatively scarce. Across 44 prevalence studies, the pooled GDM prevalence was 12.62% (95% CI: 10.23%–15.21%) using a Freeman-Tukey-transformed and DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was considerable (I² = 98.4%), with a wide 95% prediction interval (1.18%–33.50%), indicating substantial contextual variability. Prevalence estimates ranged from 0.7% to 45.9%. Common risk factors included advanced maternal age, elevated body mass index, family history of diabetes, and prior obstetric complications. Diagnostic and management approaches varied widely, with increasing adoption of the 75 g OGTT and IADPSG/WHO 2013 criteria. GDM prevalence in Africa is substantial and highly heterogeneous, reflecting uneven diagnostic practices and research capacity. Strengthened regional collaboration, greater harmonization screening, and improved health-system integration are essential to inform effective and contextually appropriate maternal health policies.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.