Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Mobilization with movement reduces pain and disability in knee osteoarthritis meta-analysis

Mobilization with movement reduces pain and disability in knee osteoarthritis meta-analysis
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider MWM for knee OA pain/disability but note limited evidence from only 2 RCTs without safety data.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of mobilization with movement (MWM) based on the Mulligan Concept for knee osteoarthritis. The analysis included 2 randomized controlled trials in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (mean age 37-61 years), comparing MWM to active controls and other control groups. The primary outcome was pain intensity, with disability improvement as a secondary outcome.

The meta-analysis using a random-effects model found MWM significantly reduced pain intensity (Hedges' g = -0.984, 95% CI = -1.375 to -0.593) and significantly improved disability (Hedges' g = -1.041, 95% CI = -1.477 to -0.606). Greater effect sizes were observed when MWM was combined with other therapies, including weight-bearing positions, and among participants without advanced Kellgren-Lawrence classification grades. Absolute numbers for these outcomes were not reported.

Safety data including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported in the included studies. Key limitations include the small number of trials (only 2 RCTs), unreported sample sizes from the included studies, unreported follow-up duration, and the need for future studies to address bias and extend follow-ups. The authors note that future studies should extend follow-ups and address bias.

For clinical practice, MWM could potentially be incorporated into rehabilitation programs to enhance pain relief and functional recovery in knee osteoarthritis patients. However, clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the limited evidence base, lack of safety data, and need for more robust trials to confirm these effects and establish optimal implementation protocols.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up732.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: Knee osteoarthritis (OA), affecting both tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments, causes pain and reduced quality of life. The Mulligan Concept of mobilization with movement (MWM) may relieve symptoms by modifying sensory input, enhancing central inhibition, and improving motor activation. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with subgroup analysis to evaluate MWM's efficacy in improving pain and disability in knee OA. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from inception to January 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of MWM on knee OA. Pain intensity and disability improvement, standardized using Hedges' g, were the primary and secondary outcomes. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality, extracted data, and performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses considered intervention regimens, technique including weight-bearing or not, Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) classification grades, and control group comparisons. RESULTS: From 2 RCTs ( participants; mean age 37-61 years), MWM significantly reduced pain (Hedges' g = -0.984, 95% CI = -1.375 to -0.593) and improved disability (Hedges' g = -1.041, 95% CI = -1.477 to - 0.606).. Greater effect sizes were observed when MWM was combined with other therapies, including weight-bearing positions, and among participants without advanced K-L grades. MWM also demonstrated significant effects in comparison with active controls. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that MWM reduces pain and disability in individuals with knee osteoarthritis, especially when incorporated into treatment protocols featuring weight-bearing positions and combined physical therapies. Clinically, MWM could be incorporated into rehabilitation programs to enhance pain relief and functional recovery. Future studies should extend follow-ups and address bias.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.