Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Incidental arrhythmia findings on ambulatory ECG vary widely in adults without prior atrial fibrillation

Incidental arrhythmia findings on ambulatory ECG vary widely in adults without prior atrial…
Photo by Joshua Chehov / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Interpret incidental arrhythmia prevalence on ambulatory ECG with caution due to high heterogeneity across studies.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the prevalence of incidental non-atrial fibrillation arrhythmias and conduction defects detected by ambulatory ECG monitoring (≥24-hour continuous rhythm monitoring) in community-based adults without prior atrial fibrillation. The analysis included 136,344 participants from primary care and general population settings.

The primary outcome was the prevalence of any non-AF incidental finding, which ranged from 4% to 96% across studies, reflecting substantial heterogeneity. The prevalence of sustained ventricular tachycardia was 0.2% (I² = 0.00%). Other specific arrhythmia types were not reported in a pooled fashion.

The authors note significant limitations, including substantial heterogeneity in definitions and reporting practices across studies, which precludes precise prevalence estimates. No adverse events or follow-up data were reported. The certainty of the evidence is low due to this variability.

Clinically, the review highlights the need for uniform reporting standards and further research to clarify the prevalence and clinical relevance of incidental arrhythmia findings on ambulatory monitoring. The wide range of prevalence estimates means these data are not generalizable, and no causal inferences can be drawn.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 136,344
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up960.0 mo
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring frequently identifies incidental arrhythmias, but their prevalence in community-based atrial fibrillation (AF) screening remains uncertain. For this systematic review, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL through January 2025 for studies on ECG abnormalities in community-based screening. Eligible studies included randomized trials or observational cohorts without prior AF that used ≥24-hour continuous rhythm monitoring and reported at least 1 incidental non-AF finding. We included 25 publications (17 cohorts, 136,344 participants; mean age 41-80 years, 0%-100% female). Non-AF abnormalities occurred in 4%-96%, including supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias and conduction defects. Meta-analyses demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in the reported prevalences of most potentially serious incidental findings, and other non-AF abnormalities. Sustained ventricular tachycardias were the only exception, showing low heterogeneity (I = 0.00%) and low pooled prevalence (0.2%). Overall, the prevalence of non-AF incidental findings during continuous ambulatory ECG screening in AF-free primary care and community-based cohorts varied widely, largely reflecting differences in definitions and reporting practices. This highlights the need for uniform reporting and further research into the prevalence and clinical relevance of these findings.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.