Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Percutaneous auricular VNS linked to blood pressure reduction in hypertensive chronic pain patients

Percutaneous auricular VNS linked to blood pressure reduction in hypertensive chronic pain patients
Photo by wu yi / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Interpret aVNS blood pressure findings cautiously due to small retrospective cohort without controls.

A retrospective cohort study at two centers examined the effects of percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) on blood pressure in 24 chronic pain patients, categorized as non-hypertensive or hypertensive. The intervention involved an 8-week aVNS treatment period with a 4-week follow-up. No comparator group was reported.

In hypertensive patients, aVNS was associated with significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (-10.7 mmHg, p=0.0003), diastolic blood pressure (-5.8 mmHg, p=0.0357), and mean arterial pressure (-9.3 mmHg, p=0.0022). Among untreated hypertensive patients specifically, systolic blood pressure decreased by -11.0 mmHg (p=0.001). No significant blood pressure changes occurred in non-hypertensive individuals. Heart rate and heart rate variability showed no significant changes.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the retrospective design, very small sample size (n=24), and lack of a sham control group, which prevents assessment of placebo effects. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported.

These findings suggest an association between aVNS and blood pressure reduction in hypertensive chronic pain patients, but the retrospective nature, small sample, and absence of controls mean this represents preliminary evidence only. The study does not establish efficacy or causality. Clinical relevance for practice cannot be determined from this limited evidence base.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundHypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, affecting over 1.28 billion adults worldwide, with nearly 46% remaining undiagnosed or untreated. Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation approach for autonomic regulation, yet its effects on blood pressure (BP) remain underexplored.ObjectiveThe effects of aVNS on blood pressure in chronic pain patients were evaluated, with a specific focus on differential responses by hypertensive status and antihypertensive treatment.MethodsThis retrospective dual-center study analyzed the impact of aVNS on BP in 24 chronic pain patients [mean age 48.5 (9.1) years; 75% female], categorized into non-hypertensive (n = 13) and hypertensive (n = 11) individuals. The hypertensive cohort was further stratified into patients receiving pharmacological hypertension treatment (n = 5) and those untreated (n = 6). Patients received aVNS over an 8-week treatment period, followed by a 4-week follow-up.ResultsOver an 8-week treatment period, hypertensive patients exhibited significant reductions in systolic BP [−10.7 (2.9) mmHg, p = 0.0003] and diastolic BP [−5.8 (2.0) mmHg, p = 0.0357], while non-hypertensive individuals showed no significant BP changes. Subgroup analysis revealed that BP reductions were most robust and consistent in untreated hypertensive patients (SBP: −11.0 mmHg, p = 0.001), whereas patients on antihypertensive medication showed greater variability. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) declined significantly in hypertensive individuals [−9.3 (6.7) mmHg, p = 0.0022]. In contrast, no significant changes were observed in heart rate or heart rate variability [e.g., heart rate: −0.9 (1.8) beats/min; root mean square of successive differences in normal RR intervals: −12.8 (9.0) ms at week 12, both p = 1.0000], suggesting preserved autonomic stability.ConclusionsaVNS may be associated with BP reductions in hypertensive patients particularly those not receiving pharmacological treatment, with minimal effects in normotensive individuals. These retrospective findings suggest a potential sustained benefit in patients with comorbid chronic pain and support further investigation through prospective, sham-controlled trials to confirm efficacy and clarify underlying mechanisms.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.